Trial reportAIDS and behavior2016
Framing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the General Public: How Inclusive Messaging May Prevent Prejudice from Diminishing Public Support.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Structural Racism and Discrimination Along the Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Continuum: A Systematic Review.AIDS and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Sexual Stereotypes Ascribed to Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: An Intersectional Analysis.Archives of sexual behavior · 2018Trial
- 'Educating, demystifying, destigmatising': Black women's perspectives on effective PrEP messaging in the USA.Culture, health & sexuality · 2026Article
- "It's Not Secret-It's Not Advertised" - Content, Format, and Platform Preferences to Promote PrEP Use in the Southern United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Development and feasibility testing of a PrEP uptake and adherence intervention for women with trauma-related mental health conditions: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: The PrEP Cascade Paradigm Shift for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Prevention.Viruses · 2026Review
- Medical Mistrust and Willingness to Use Long-Acting PrEP Among Black and Hispanic/Latino MSM.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- Gain-Framed Health Messaging, Medical Trust, and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Self-Efficacy: An Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and Pilot Testing of an Addiction Clinic-Based Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Adherence Intervention for Women with Substance Use Disorders: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Missed Opportunities When We Focus only on Risk: Using the Concerns Based Conversation Starter to Identify Potential PrEP Candidates.AIDS and behavior · 2023Article
- Engaging Black men who have sex with men (MSM) in the South in identifying strategies to increase PrEP uptake.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- An Experimental Study of the Effects of Patient Race, Sexual Orientation, and Injection Drug Use on Providers' PrEP-Related Clinical Judgments.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Awareness of Preexposure Prophylaxis Among HIV-Negative Heterosexually Active Adults at Increased Risk for HIV Infection - 23 Urban Areas, United States, 2019.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2021Article
- Understanding, Contextualizing, and Addressing PrEP Stigma to Enhance PrEP Implementation.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2020Review
- Effectively Communicating About HIV and Other Health Disparities: Findings From a Literature Review and Future Directions.Frontiers in communication · 2020Article
- Article
- Area-level HIV risk and socioeconomic factors associated with willingness to use PrEP among Black people in the U.S. South.Annals of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Why more men who have sex with men are not using PrEP-The role played by lack of interest in learning more about PrEP.Journal of gay & lesbian social services · 2020Article
- Low Disclosure of PrEP Nonadherence and HIV-Risk Behaviors Associated With Poor HIV PrEP Adherence in the HPTN 067/ADAPT Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Strategic framing of public messages about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may influence public support for policies and programs affecting access. This survey study examined how public attitudes toward PrEP differed based on the social group PrEP was described as benefiting ("beneficiary") and the moderating effect of prejudice. Members of the general public (n = 154) recruited online were randomly assigned to three beneficiary conditions: general population, gay men, or Black gay men. All participants received identical PrEP background information before completing measures of PrEP attitudes (specifying beneficiary), racism, and heterosexism. Despite anticipating greater PrEP adherence among gay men and Black gay men and perceiving PrEP as especially beneficial to the latter, participants expressed lower support for policies/programs making PrEP affordable for these groups vs. the general population. This disparity in support was stronger among participants reporting greater prejudice. Inclusive framing of PrEP in public discourse may prevent prejudice from undermining implementation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.