Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891827›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2016

Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Eric S Seemiller, Jingyun Wang, T Rowan Candy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric S Seemiller
Jingyun Wang
T Rowan Candy

Funding

Accommodation and Defocus in the Infant Visual SystemR01EY014460 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI CANDY, T ROWAN · 2003 to 2025
$7.5M
Core Support for Vision Research at Indiana UniversityP30EY019008 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BURNS, STEPHEN A · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants have been shown to make vergence eye movements by 1 month of age to stimulation with prisms or targets moving in depth. However, little is currently understood about the threshold sensitivity of the maturing visual system to such stimulation. In this study, 5- to 10-week-old human infants and adults viewed a target moving in depth as a triangle wave of three amplitudes (1.0, 0.5, and 0.25 meter angles). Their horizontal eye position and the refractive state of both eyes were measured simultaneously. The vergence responses of the infants and adults varied at the same frequency as the stimulus at the three tested modulation amplitudes. For a typical infant of this age, the smallest amplitude is equivalent to an interocular change of approximately 2° of retinal disparity, from nearest to farthest points. The infants' accommodation responses only modulated reliably to the largest stimulus, while adults responded to all three amplitudes. Although the accommodative system appears relatively insensitive, the sensitivity of the vergence responses suggests that subtle cues are available to drive vergence in the second month after birth.

Indexed as

AdultConvergence, OcularCuesEye MovementsFemaleHumansInfantMaleVision Disparity

Identifiers

PMID26891827
PMCPMC5089217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.