Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891811›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2016

CD4+ T-cell epitope prediction using antigen processing constraints.

Ramgopal R Mettu, Tysheena Charles, Samuel J Landry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deimmunizing substitutions inThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramgopal R MettuDepartment of Computer Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA; Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases Research Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. Electronic address: rmettu@tulane.edu.
Tysheena CharlesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Samuel J LandryDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

HIV ENV epitope engineeringR01AI080367 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI LANDRY, SAMUEL JOHN · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
Antigen Structure-Based Supervised Learning for CD4+ T-cell Epitope PredictionR21AI122199 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI METTU, RAMGOPAL · 2016 to 2017
$414k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080367NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI080367NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI122199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell CD4+ epitopes are important targets of immunity against infectious diseases and cancer. State-of-the-art methods for MHC class II epitope prediction rely on supervised learning methods in which an implicit or explicit model of sequence specificity is constructed using a training set of peptides with experimentally tested MHC class II binding affinity. In this paper we present a novel method for CD4+ T-cell eptitope prediction based on modeling antigen-processing constraints. Previous work indicates that dominant CD4+ T-cell epitopes tend to occur adjacent to sites of initial proteolytic cleavage. Given an antigen with known three-dimensional structure, our algorithm first aggregates four types of conformational stability data in order to construct a profile of stability that allows us to identify regions of the protein that are most accessible to proteolysis. Using this profile, we then construct a profile of epitope likelihood based on the pattern of transitions from unstable to stable regions. We validate our method using 35 datasets of experimentally measured CD4+ T cell responses of mice bearing I-Ab or HLA-DR4 alleles as well as of human subjects. Overall, our results show that antigen processing constraints provide a significant source of predictive power. For epitope prediction in single-allele systems, our approach can be combined with sequence-based methods, or used in instances where little or no training data is available. In multiple-allele systems, sequence-based methods can only be used if the allele distribution of a population is known. In contrast, our approach does not make use of MHC binding prediction, and is thus agnostic to MHC class II genotypes.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationModels, ImmunologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsAntigens, PlantCapsid ProteinsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDatabases, ProteinEpitope MappingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-DR4 AntigenHumansImmunodominant EpitopesMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicProtein BindingAntigens, PlantBet v 1 allergen, BetulaCapsid ProteinsEpitopes, T-Lymphocytehexon capsid protein, AdenovirusHLA-DR4 AntigenImmunodominant EpitopesCD4+ T-cell responseEpitope predictionMHC class IIProtein structure

Identifiers

PMID26891811
PMCPMC5321161
OpenAlexW2279917062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.