Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891722›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

The impact of retirement on health: quasi-experimental methods using administrative data.

Elizabeth Mokyr Horner, Mark R Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The effects of an increase in the retirement age on health care costs: evidence from administrative data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cohort Profile: The American Manufacturing Cohort (AMC) study.International journal of epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth Mokyr HornerAmerican Institutes for Research, 2800 Campus Dr. Suite 200, San Mateo, CA, 94330, USA. elli.horner@gmail.com.
Mark R CullenStanford University School of Medicine, Population Health Sciences, MSOB 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. mrcullen@stanford.edu.

Funding

Risk factors for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia: Evidence from a Large Occupational CohortR01AG026291 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LINDA, EISEN, ELLEN AURA · 2006 to 2021
$12.9M
The Design of Social Insurance for the Elderly: Public Pensions & Health InsurancR01AG032449 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI EINAV, LIRAN, FINKELSTEIN, AMY N. · 2009 to 2019
$5.6M
NIA NIH HHS 1 R01 AG026291-06NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG032449-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026291NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIs retirement good or bad for health? Disentangling causality is difficult. Much of the previous quasi-experimental research on the effect of health on retirement used self-reported health and relied upon discontinuities in public retirement incentives across Europe. The current study investigated the effect of retirement on health by exploiting discontinuities in private retirement incentives to test the effect of retirement on health using a quasi-experimental study design.

methodsSecondary data (1997-2009) on a cohort of male manufacturing workers in a United States setting. Health status was determined using claims data from private insurance and Medicare. Analyses used employer-based administrative and claims data and claim data from Medicare.

resultsWidely used selection on observables models overstate the negative impact of retirement due to the endogeneity of the decision to retire. In addition, health status as measured by administrative claims data provide some advantages over the more commonly used survey items. Using an instrument and administrative health records, we find null to positive effects from retirement on all fronts, with a possible exception of increased risk for diabetes.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that retirement is not detrimental and may be beneficial to health for a sample of manufacturing workers. In addition, it supports previous research indicating that quasi-experimental methodologies are necessary to evaluate the relationship between retirement and health, as any selection on observable model will overstate the negative relationship of retirement on health. Further, it provides a model for how such research could be implemented in countries like the United States that do not have a strong public pension program. Finally, it demonstrates that such research need-not rely upon survey data, which has certain shortcomings and is not always available for homogenous samples.

Indexed as

Health StatusAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedMotivationPensionsRetirementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26891722
PMCPMC4759763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.