Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891420›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2016

A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study of tivantinib (ARQ 197) in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS who have received first-line systemic therapy.

Cathy Eng, Alberto Bessudo, Lowell L Hart, Aleksey Severtsev, Oleg Gladkov, Lothar Müller, Mikhail V Kopp, Vladimir Vladimirov, Robert Langdon, Bogdan Kotiv and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

Cathy EngThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Alberto BessudocCARE (California Cancer Associates for Research & Excellence), Encinitas, CA.
Lowell L HartFlorida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Fort Myers, FL.
Aleksey SevertsevThe Central Clinical Hospital #1, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg GladkovChelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Lothar MüllerOnkologie Untere Ems Leer-Emden-Papenburg, Leer, Germany.
Mikhail V KoppSamara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Samara, Russia.
Vladimir VladimirovPyatigorsk Oncological Dispensary, Pyatigorsk, Russia.
Robert LangdonNebraska Methodist Hospital Cancer Center, Omaha, NE.
Bogdan KotivMilitary Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Sandro BarniAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Ching HsuDaiichi Sankyo, Inc, Edison, NJ.
Ellen BolotinBayer HealthCare, Whippany, NJ, (Employed at Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. At Time of Manuscript Preparation).
Reinhard von RoemelingDaiichi Sankyo, Inc, Edison, NJ.
Brian SchwartzArQule, Inc, Burlington, MA.
Johanna C BendellTennessee Oncology/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN.
Daiichi Sankyo (United States) · USArqule (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITBayer (United States) · USCalifornia Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence · USCentral Clinical Hospital and Polyclinic · RUChelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Center · RUFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USMethodist Hospital · USPyatigorsk Oncology Center · RUSamara Regional Clinical Oncology Center · RUSarah Cannon · USS. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy · RUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Applied Sciences Emden Leer · DE

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cetuximab in combination with an irinotecan-containing regimen is a standard treatment in patients with KRAS wild-type (KRAS WT), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated the addition of the oral MET inhibitor tivantinib to cetuximab + irinotecan (CETIRI) based on preclinical evidence that activation of the MET pathway may confer resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Previously treated patients with KRAS WT advanced or mCRC were enrolled. The phase 1, open-label 3 + 3, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety and maximally tolerated dose of tivantinib plus CETIRI. The phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of biweekly CETIRI plus tivantinib or placebo was restricted to patients who had received only one prior line of chemotherapy. The phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The recommended phase 2 dose was tivantinib (360 mg/m(2) twice daily) with biweekly cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)). Among 117 patients evaluable for phase 2 analysis, no statistically significant PFS difference was observed: 8.3 months on tivantinib vs. 7.3 months on placebo (HR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.33; P = 0.38). Subgroup analyses trended in favor of tivantinib in patients with MET-High tumors by immunohistochemistry, PTEN-Low tumors, or those pretreated with oxaliplatin, but subgroups were too small to draw conclusions. Neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea and rash were the most frequent severe adverse events in tivantinib-treated patients. The combination of tivantinib and CETIRI was well tolerated but did not significantly improve PFS in previously treated KRAS WT mCRC. Tivantinib may be more active in specific subgroups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIrinotecanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyrrolidinonesARQ 197CamptothecinCetuximabIrinotecanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyrrolidinonesQuinolinesirinotecanKRAS wild-typemetastatic colorectal cancerMET inhibitortivantinib

Identifiers

PMID26891420
PMCPMC5071720
OpenAlexW2275428290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.