ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016
Development of Microfluidic Systems Enabling High-Throughput Single-Cell Protein Characterization.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modification of a Low-Cost Pipetting Robot for Nanoliter Liquid Handling and Autosampling for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Design of a Multiplexed Analyte Biosensor using Digital Barcoded Particles and Impedance Spectroscopy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Biocompatible/Biodegradable Electrowetting on Dielectric Microfluidic Chips with Fluorinated CTA/PLGA.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Of Cytometry, Stem Cells and Fountain of Youth.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017Review
- Immune cell profiling in cancer: molecular approaches to cell-specific identification.NPJ precision oncology · 2017Review
- Centrosomal clustering contributes to chromosomal instability and cancer.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2016Review
- Development of Droplet Microfluidics Enabling High-Throughput Single-Cell Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews recent developments in microfluidic systems enabling high-throughput characterization of single-cell proteins. Four key perspectives of microfluidic platforms are included in this review: (1) microfluidic fluorescent flow cytometry; (2) droplet based microfluidic flow cytometry; (3) large-array micro wells (microengraving); and (4) large-array micro chambers (barcode microchips). We examine the advantages and limitations of each technique and discuss future research opportunities by focusing on three key performance parameters (absolute quantification, sensitivity, and throughput).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.