Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891250›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2017

Finite element models of the human shoulder complex: a review of their clinical implications and modelling techniques.

Manxu Zheng, Zhenmin Zou, Paulo Jorge Da Silva Bartolo, Chris Peach, Lei Ren

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimal suturing techniques in patch-bridging reconstruction for massive rotator cuff tears: A finite element analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Future Directions in Patellofemoral Imaging and 3D Modeling.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manxu ZhengSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Zhenmin ZouSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Paulo Jorge Da Silva BartoloSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Chris PeachSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Lei RenSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
University of Manchester · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human shoulder is a complicated musculoskeletal structure and is a perfect compromise between mobility and stability. The objective of this paper is to provide a thorough review of previous finite element (FE) studies in biomechanics of the human shoulder complex. Those FE studies to investigate shoulder biomechanics have been reviewed according to the physiological and clinical problems addressed: glenohumeral joint stability, rotator cuff tears, joint capsular and labral defects and shoulder arthroplasty. The major findings, limitations, potential clinical applications and modelling techniques of those FE studies are critically discussed. The main challenges faced in order to accurately represent the realistic physiological functions of the shoulder mechanism in FE simulations involve (1) subject-specific representation of the anisotropic nonhomogeneous material properties of the shoulder tissues in both healthy and pathological conditions; (2) definition of boundary and loading conditions based on individualised physiological data; (3) more comprehensive modelling describing the whole shoulder complex including appropriate three-dimensional (3D) representation of all major shoulder hard tissues and soft tissues and their delicate interactions; (4) rigorous in vivo experimental validation of FE simulation results. Fully validated shoulder FE models would greatly enhance our understanding of the aetiology of shoulder disorders, and hence facilitate the development of more efficient clinical diagnoses, non-surgical and surgical treatments, as well as shoulder orthotics and prosthetics. © 2016 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisModels, AnatomicHumansShoulderShoulder Jointarthroplastybiomechanicscomputational modellingfinite elementglenohumeral jointhuman shoulder complex

Identifiers

PMID26891250
PMCPMC5297878
OpenAlexW2277337477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.