Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26891058›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2016

Linking databases on perinatal health: a review of the literature and current practices in Europe.

M Delnord, K Szamotulska, A D Hindori-Mohangoo, B Blondel, A J Macfarlane, N Dattani, C Barona, S Berrut, I Zile, R Wood and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Subprime Babies: The Foreclosure Crisis and Initial Health Endowments.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Evaluation of identifier field agreement in linked neonatal records.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  15. In the Real-World, Kids Use Medications and Devices.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M DelnordINSERM, UMR 1153 Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France Marie.delnord@inserm.fr.
K SzamotulskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Research Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
A D Hindori-MohangooNetherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, TNO Healthy Living, Department Child Health, Leiden, The Netherlands Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department Public Health, Paramaribo, Suriname.
B BlondelINSERM, UMR 1153 Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
A J MacfarlaneCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University London, London, UK.
N DattaniCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City University London, London, UK.
C BaronaGeneral Directorate of Public Health, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
S BerrutSwiss Federal Statistical Office, Section Health, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
I ZileCentre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
R WoodInformation Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
L SakkeusEstonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
M GisslerInformation Services Department, THL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
J ZeitlinINSERM, UMR 1153 Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee

Funding

Department of Health 12/136/93Medical Research Council MC_G0801801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational comparisons of perinatal health indicators are complicated by the heterogeneity of data sources on pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Record linkage can extend the range of data items available and thus can improve the validity and quality of routine data. We sought to assess the extent to which data are linked routinely for perinatal health research and reporting.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching PubMed for perinatal health studies from 2001 to 2011 based on linkage of routine data (data collected continuously at various time intervals). We also surveyed European health monitoring professionals about use of linkage for national perinatal health surveillance.

results516 studies fit our inclusion criteria. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, the US and the UK contributed 76% of the publications; a further 29 countries contributed at least one publication. Most studies linked vital statistics, hospital records, medical birth registries and cohort data. Other sources were specific registers for: cancer (70), congenital anomalies (56), ART (19), census (19), health professionals (37), insurance (22) prescription (31), and level of education (18). Eighteen of 29 countries (62%) reported linking data for routine perinatal health monitoring.

conclusionResearch using linkage is concentrated in a few countries and is not widely practiced in Europe. Broader adoption of data linkage could yield substantial gains for perinatal health research and surveillance.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualEuropeFemaleHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthPerinatal CarePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26891058
PMCPMC4884328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.