Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26890305›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2016

Underestimation of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Italy.

Chiara Azzari, Francesco Nieddu, Maria Moriondo, Giuseppe Indolfi, Clementina Canessa, Silvia Ricci, Leila Bianchi, Daniele Serranti, Giovanni Maria Poggi, Massimo Resti

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recurrent invasive meningococcal infections - quantifying the risk, Germany, 2002 to 2018.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Article
  11. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (TrumenbaJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interconnected clusters of invasive meningococcal disease due toEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. [Advances in diagnostic microbiology : Opportunities and limitations].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara Azzari
Francesco Nieddu
Maria Moriondo
Giuseppe Indolfi
Clementina Canessa
Silvia Ricci
Leila Bianchi
Daniele Serranti
Giovanni Maria Poggi
Massimo Resti
Temple Street Children's University Hospital · IEUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is essential for planning appropriate vaccination policies. However, IMD may be underestimated because of misdiagnosis or insufficiently sensitive laboratory methods. Using a national molecular surveillance register, we assessed the number of cases misdiagnosed and diagnoses obtained postmortem with real-time PCR (rPCR), and we compared sensitivity of rPCR versus culture-based testing. A total of 222 IMD cases were identified: 11 (42%) of 26 fatal cases had been misdiagnosed or undiagnosed and were reclassified as IMD after rPCR showed meningococcal DNA in all available specimens taken postmortem. Of the samples tested with both rPCR and culture, 58% were diagnosed by using rPCR alone. The underestimation factor associated with the use of culture alone was 3.28. In countries such as Italy, where rPCR is in limited use, IMD incidence may be largely underestimated; thus, assessments of benefits of meningococcal vaccination may be prone to error.

Indexed as

Neisseria meningitidisAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantItalyMaleMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesMeningococcal Vaccinesbacteriabacterial meningitisinvasive meningococcal diseaseItalymisdiagnosisNeisseria meningitidisPCRunderestimationunderreporting

Identifiers

PMID26890305
PMCPMC4766889
OpenAlexW2406983649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.