Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26890070›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2016

Cytokinetic effects of Wee1 disruption in pancreatic cancer.

Qing Chang, Megha Chandrashekhar, Troy Ketela, Yaroslav Fedyshyn, Jason Moffat, David Hedley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qing Changa Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Cancer Center , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Megha Chandrashekharb Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Genetics , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Troy Ketelaa Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Cancer Center , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Yaroslav Fedyshynb Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Genetics , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Jason Moffatb Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Genetics , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
David Hedleya Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Cancer Center , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wee1 kinase, which is activated in response to DNA damage, regulates exit from G2 through inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1/Cdc2, and is an attractive drug target. However, recent work has highlighted effects of Cdk2 phosphorylation by Wee1 on movement through S-phase, suggesting the potential to sensitize to S-phase specific agents by Wee1 inhibitors. In this paper we applied multiparametric flow cytometry to patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenograft tumor cells to study the cell cycle perturbations of Wee1 disruption via the small molecule inhibitor MK-1775, and genetic knockdown. We find that in vitro treatment with MK-1775, and to a lesser degree, Wee1 RNA transcript knockdown, results in the striking appearance of S-phase cells prematurely entering into mitosis. This effect was not seen in vivo in any of the models tested. Here, although we noted an increase of S-phase cells expressing the damage response marker γH2AX, treatment with MK-1775 did not significantly sensitize cells to the cytidine analog gemcitabine. Treatment with MK-1775 did result in a transient but large increase in cells expressing the mitotic marker phosphorylated H3S10 that reached a peak 4 hours after treatment. This suggests a role for Wee1 regulating the progression of genomically unstable cancer cells through G2 in the absence of extrinsically-applied DNA damage. A single dose of 8Gy ionizing radiation resulted in the time-dependent accumulation of Cyclin A2 positive/phosphorylated H3S10 negative cells at the 4N position, which was abrogated by treatment with MK-1775. Consistent with these findings, a genome-scale pooled RNA interference screen revealed that toxic doses of MK-1775 are suppressed by CDK2 or Cyclin A2 knockdown. These findings support G2 exit as the more significant effect of Wee1 inhibition in pancreatic cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCyclin A2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2DNA DamageFlow CytometryGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMitosisNuclear ProteinsPancreatic NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesadavosertibCCNA2 protein, humanCDK2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin A2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Nuclear ProteinsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinesPyrimidinonesWEE1 protein, humanflow cytometryG2 checkpointionizing radiationpancreatic cancerpatient-derived xenograftγH2AX

Identifiers

PMID26890070
PMCPMC5056606
OpenAlexW2278792103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.