Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26890001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cost-Effectiveness of Combined Sexual and Injection Risk Reduction Interventions among Female Sex Workers Who Inject Drugs in Two Very Distinct Mexican Border Cities.

Jose L Burgos, Thomas L Patterson, Joshua S Graff-Zivin, James G Kahn, M Gudelia Rangel, M Remedios Lozada, Hugo Staines, Steffanie A Strathdee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose L BurgosUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Global Public Health, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Thomas L PattersonUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Joshua S Graff-ZivinUniversity of California San Diego, School of Global Policy and Strategy, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
James G KahnUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Global Health Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
M Gudelia RangelSecretaria de Salud de México, Comision de Salud Fronteriza Mexico-Estados Unidos Sección México, Tijuana, Baja California, México.
M Remedios LozadaInstituto de Servicios de Salud Pública del Estado de Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico.
Hugo StainesUniversidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Facultad de Medicina, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México.
Steffanie A StrathdeeUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Global Public Health, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Diego · USInstituto de Salud del Estado de México · MXSecretaria de Salud · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez · MXUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR01DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2002 to 2017
$9.4M
Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
Intervention for Female Workers in MexicoR01MH065849 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PATTERSON, THOMAS L. · 2004 to 2008
$3.6M
Epidemiologic Study on Changing HIV Risks Among FSW-IDUs on the Mexico-US BorderR01DA023877 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2008 to 2012
$3.3M
The Role of Economic Evaluation in Translating HIV/AIDS Behavioral InterventionsK01MH095680 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BURGOS, JOSE LUIS · 2012 to 2016
$902k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015612NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023877NIDA NIH HHS R01DA023877NIDA NIH HHS R01DA023877-S1NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH095680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated the cost-effectiveness of combined single session brief behavioral intervention, either didactic or interactive (Mujer Mas Segura, MMS) to promote safer-sex and safer-injection practices among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSW-IDUs) in Tijuana (TJ) and Ciudad-Juarez (CJ) Mexico. Data for this analysis was obtained from a factorial RCT in 2008-2010 coinciding with expansion of needle exchange programs (NEP) in TJ, but not in CJ.

methodsA Markov model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained (QALY) over a lifetime time frame among a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 FSW-IDUs comparing a less intensive didactic vs. a more intensive interactive format of the MMS, separately for safer sex and safer injection combined behavioral interventions. The costs for antiretroviral therapy was not included in the model. We applied a societal perspective, a discount rate of 3% per year and currency adjusted to US$2014. A multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed. The combined and individual components of the MMS interactive behavioral intervention were compared with the didactic formats by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), defined as incremental unit of cost per additional health benefit (e.g., HIV/STI cases averted, QALYs) compared to the next least costly strategy. Following guidelines from the World Health Organization, a combined strategy was considered highly cost-effective if the incremental cost per QALY gained fell below the gross domestic product per capita (GDP) in Mexico (equivalent to US$10,300).

findingsFor CJ, the mixed intervention approach of interactive safer sex/didactic safer injection had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$4,360 ($310-$7,200) per QALY gained compared with a dually didactic strategy. Using the dually interactive strategy had an ICER of US$5,874 ($310-$7,200) compared with the mixed approach. For TJ, the combination of interactive safer sex/didactic safer injection had an ICER of US$5,921 ($104-$9,500) per QALY compared with dually didactic. Strategies using the interactive safe injection intervention were dominated due to lack of efficacy advantage. The multivariate sensitivity analysis showed a 95% certainty that in both CJ and TJ the ICER for the mixed approach (interactive safer sex didactic safer injection intervention) was less than the GDP per capita for Mexico. The dual interactive approach met this threshold consistently in CJ, but not in TJ.

interpretationIn the absence of an expanded NEP in CJ, the combined-interactive formats of the MMS behavioral intervention is highly cost-effective. In contrast, in TJ where NEP expansion suggests that improved access to sterile syringes significantly reduced injection-related risks, the interactive safer-sex combined didactic safer-injection was highly cost-effective compared with the combined didactic versions of the safer-sex and safer-injection formats of the MMS, with no added benefit from the interactive safer-injection component.

Indexed as

CitiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDangerous BehaviorDrug UsersRisk Reduction BehaviorSexual BehaviorSex WorkersCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMexicoModels, StatisticalPublic Health SurveillanceQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID26890001
PMCPMC4758635
OpenAlexW2283715333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.