Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26889969›Full record

SynthesisEpigenetics2016

An epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of prenatal maternal stress in neonates: A model approach for replication.

Jolien Rijlaarsdam, Irene Pappa, Esther Walton, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Viara R Mileva-Seitz, Ralph C A Rippe, Sabine J Roza, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Frank C Verhulst, Janine F Felix and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epigenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. InvestigatingBrain sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. DNA methylation at birth and lateral ventricular volume in childhood: a neuroimaging epigenetics study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jolien Rijlaarsdama Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Irene Pappab Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Esther Waltone Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London , UK.
Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburga Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Viara R Mileva-Seitza Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Ralph C A Rippea Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Sabine J Rozac Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/ Psychology , Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Vincent W V Jaddoeb Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Frank C Verhulstc Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/ Psychology , Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Janine F Felixg Department of Epidemiology , Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Charlotte A M Cecile Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London , UK.
Caroline L Reltoni Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Tom R Gaunti Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Wendy McArdlej School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Jonathan Millk University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter , Exeter , UK.
Edward D Barkere Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London , London , UK.
Henning Tiemeierc Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/ Psychology , Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , the Netherlands.
Marinus H van IJzendoorna Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLKing's College London · GBLeiden University · NLMedical Research Council · GBErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Epigenetic Pathways to Conduct Problem Trajectories: Early Environmental RisksR01HD068437 · NICHD · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI BARKER, EDWARD D., MILL, JONATHAN · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/2NICHD NIH HHS R01HD068437Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust 102215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal maternal stress exposure has been associated with neonatal differential DNA methylation. However, the available evidence in humans is largely based on candidate gene methylation studies, where only a few CpG sites were evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the association between prenatal exposure to maternal stress and offspring genome-wide cord blood methylation using different methods. First, we conducted a meta-analysis and follow-up pathway analyses. Second, we used novel region discovery methods [i.e., differentially methylated regions (DMRs) analyses]. To this end, we used data from two independent population-based studies, the Generation R Study (n = 912) and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC, n = 828), to (i) measure genome-wide DNA methylation in cord blood and (ii) extract a prenatal maternal stress composite. The meta-analysis (ntotal = 1,740) revealed no epigenome-wide (meta P <1.00e-07) associations of prenatal maternal stress exposure with neonatal differential DNA methylation. Follow-up analyses of the top hits derived from our epigenome-wide meta-analysis (meta P <1.00e-04) indicated an over-representation of the methyltransferase activity pathway. We identified no Bonferroni-corrected (P <1.00e-06) DMRs associated with prenatal maternal stress exposure. Combining data from two independent population-based samples in an epigenome-wide meta-analysis, the current study indicates that there are no large effects of prenatal maternal stress exposure on neonatal DNA methylation. Such replication efforts are essential in the search for robust associations, whether derived from candidate gene methylation or epigenome-wide studies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticMaternal ExposureAdultCpG IslandsFemaleFetal BloodGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsStress, PsychologicalBirth cohortcord bloodDNA methylationepigenome-wide association study (EWAS)prenatal maternal stress

Identifiers

PMID26889969
PMCPMC4846102
OpenAlexW2276786836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.