Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26889666›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2016

Concise Review: Control of Cell Fate Through Cell Cycle and Pluripotency Networks.

Ben Boward, Tianming Wu, Stephen Dalton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cell competition driven by secreted ligands: Modeling liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Coupling of stemness maintenance with cell cycle control in stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sfrp4 is required to maintain Ctsk-lineage periosteal stem cell niche function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben BowardDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, Paul D. Coverdell Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Tianming WuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, Paul D. Coverdell Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Stephen DaltonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, Paul D. Coverdell Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) proliferate rapidly with a characteristic cell cycle structure consisting of short G1- and G2-gap phases. This applies broadly to PSCs of peri-implantation stage embryos, cultures of embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and embryonal carcinoma cells. During the early stages of PSC differentiation however, cell division times increase as a consequence of cell cycle remodeling. Most notably, this is indicated by elongation of the G1-phase. Observations linking changes in the cell cycle with exit from pluripotency have raised questions about the role of cell cycle control in maintenance of the pluripotent state. Until recently however, this has been a difficult question to address because of limitations associated with experimental tools. Recent studies now show that pluripotency and cell cycle regulatory networks are intertwined and that cell cycle control mechanisms are an integral, mechanistic part of the PSC state. Studies in embryonal carcinoma, some 30 years ago, first suggested that pluripotent cells initiate differentiation when in the G1-phase. More recently, a molecular "priming" mechanism has been proposed to explain these observations in human embryonic stem cells. Complexity in this area has been increased by the realization that pluripotent cells exist in multiple developmental states and that in addition to each having their own characteristic gene expression and epigenetic signatures, they potentially have alternate modes of cell cycle regulation. This review will summarize current knowledge in these areas and will highlight important aspects of interconnections between the cell cycle, self-renewal, pluripotency, and cell fate decisions. Stem Cells 2016;34:1427-1436.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell LineageAnimalsCell Self RenewalCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansPluripotent Stem CellsCell cycleDifferentiationEmbryonic stem cellsPluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID26889666
PMCPMC5201256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.