ArticleCancer biology & therapy2016
Validating the disruption of proliferating cell nuclear antigen interactions in the development of targeted cancer therapeutics.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for novel chemical scaffolds targeting PCNA identifies the Hsp90alpha inhibitor SNX-2112.Current research in structural biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Molecular Targeting of Cancer-Associated PCNA Interactions in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using a Cell-Penetrating Peptide.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human DNA replication and repair is a highly coordinated process involving the specifically timed actions of numerous proteins and enzymes. Many of these proteins require interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) for activation within the process. The interdomain connector loop (IDCL) of PCNA provides a docking site for many of those proteins, suggesting that this region is critically important in the regulation of cellular function. Previous work in this laboratory has demonstrated that a peptide mimicking a specific region of the IDCL (caPeptide) has the ability to disrupt key protein-protein interactions between PCNA and its binding partners, thereby inhibiting DNA replication within the cells. In this study, we confirm the ability of the caPeptide to disrupt DNA replication function using both intact cell and in vitro DNA replication assays. Further, we were able to demonstrate that treatment with caPeptide results in a decrease of polymerase δ activity that correlates with the observed decrease in DNA replication. We have also successfully developed a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay to validate the disruption of the PCNA-pol δ interaction with caPeptide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.