Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26889489›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2016

Integrating bevacizumab and radiation treatment of brain metastasis: is there sense and sensibility in this approach?

Emil Lou, Paul W Sperduto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Advances in Bevacizumab Therapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 
with Brain Metastases].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emil Lou1 Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA ; 2 Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Paul W Sperduto1 Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA ; 2 Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of brain metastasis has increased over the past decade. Standard treatment options for brain metastases include whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and surgery for patients with operable lesions and either mass effect or need for histologic confirmation of the diagnosis. Patients are living longer due to improvements in systemic therapeutic approaches, included targeted therapies such as inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Bev). A recent phase I trial (REBECA) investigated adding Bev to whole-brain radiation for patients with brain metastasis from solid tumors. In this Perspectives article, we discuss the results of the REBECA trial in context of advancements in radiation and medical oncology in the era of targeted therapies, and discuss pertinent questions of interest in this field.

Indexed as

angiogenesisbevacizumab (Bev)Brain metastasisvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)whole-brain radiation

Identifiers

PMID26889489
PMCPMC4731601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.