Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26889477›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2016

Towards precision medicine in epilepsy surgery.

Pingping Jin, Dongyan Wu, Xiaoxuan Li, Liankun Ren, Yuping Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pingping Jin1 Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China ; 3 Department of Neurology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Dongyan Wu1 Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China ; 3 Department of Neurology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Xiaoxuan Li1 Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China ; 3 Department of Neurology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Liankun Ren1 Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China ; 3 Department of Neurology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
Yuping Wang1 Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China ; 3 Department of Neurology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to a third of all patients with epilepsy are refractory to medical therapy even in the context of the introduction of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with considerable advantages in safety and tolerability over the last two decades. It has been widely accepted that epilepsy surgery is a highly effective therapeutic option in a selected subset of patients with refractory focal seizure. There is no doubt that accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is crucial to the success of resection surgery for intractable epilepsy. The pre-surgical evaluation requires a multimodality approach wherein each modality provides unique and complimentary information. Accurate localization of EZ still remains challenging, especially in patients with normal features on MRI. Whereas substantial progress has been made in the methods of pre-surgical assessment in recent years, which widened the applicability of surgical treatment for children and adults with refractory seizure. Advances in neuroimaging including voxel-based morphometric MRI analysis, multimodality techniques and computer-aided subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI have improved our ability to identify subtle structural and metabolic lesions causing focal seizure. Considerable observations from animal model with epilepsy and pre-surgical patients have consistently found a strong correlation between high frequency oscillations (HFOs) and epileptogenic brain tissue that suggest HFOs could be a potential biomarker of EZ. Since SEEG emphasizes the importance to study the spatiotemporal dynamics of seizure discharges, accounting for the dynamic, multidirectional spatiotemporal organization of the ictal discharges, it has greatly deep our understanding of the anatomo-electro-clinical profile of seizure. In this review, we focus on some state-of-the-art pre-surgical investigations that contribute to the precision medicine. Furthermore, advances also provide opportunity to achieve the minimal side effects and maximal benefit individually, which meets the need for the current concept of precision medicine in epilepsy surgery.

Indexed as

epilepsy surgeryprecision medicinepre-surgical evaluationRefractory epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID26889477
PMCPMC4731603
OpenAlexW2265173411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.