Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26888902›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Newcastle Disease Viruses Causing Recent Outbreaks Worldwide Show Unexpectedly High Genetic Similarity to Historical Virulent Isolates from the 1940s.

Kiril M Dimitrov, Dong-Hun Lee, Dawn Williams-Coplin, Timothy L Olivier, Patti J Miller, Claudio L Afonso

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The CRM1-dependent NESVeterinary research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiril M DimitrovSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Dong-Hun LeeSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Dawn Williams-CoplinSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Timothy L OlivierSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Patti J MillerSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Claudio L AfonsoSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Athens, Georgia, USA claudio.afonso@ars.usda.gov.
U.S. National Poultry Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virulent strains of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) cause Newcastle disease (ND), a devastating disease of poultry and wild birds. Phylogenetic analyses clearly distinguish historical isolates (obtained prior to 1960) from currently circulating viruses of class II genotypes V, VI, VII, and XII through XVIII. Here, partial and complete genomic sequences of recent virulent isolates of genotypes II and IX from China, Egypt, and India were found to be nearly identical to those of historical viruses isolated in the 1940s. Phylogenetic analysis, nucleotide distances, and rates of change demonstrate that these recent isolates have not evolved significantly from the most closely related ancestors from the 1940s. The low rates of change for these virulent viruses (7.05 × 10(-5) and 2.05 × 10(-5) per year, respectively) and the minimal genetic distances existing between these and historical viruses (0.3 to 1.2%) of the same genotypes indicate an unnatural origin. As with any other RNA virus, Newcastle disease virus is expected to evolve naturally; thus, these findings suggest that some recent field isolates should be excluded from evolutionary studies. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses show that these recent virulent isolates are more closely related to virulent strains isolated during the 1940s, which have been and continue to be used in laboratory and experimental challenge studies. Since the preservation of viable viruses in the environment for over 6 decades is highly unlikely, it is possible that the source of some of the recent virulent viruses isolated from poultry and wild birds might be laboratory viruses.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksGenetic VariationGenotypeAnimalsBirdsChinaEgyptGenome, ViralIndiaMolecular EpidemiologyNewcastle DiseaseNewcastle disease virusPhylogenyPoultrySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26888902
PMCPMC4844730
OpenAlexW2342428641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.