Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26888899›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Seeded Amplification of Chronic Wasting Disease Prions in Nasal Brushings and Recto-anal Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissues from Elk by Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion.

Nicholas J Haley, Chris Siepker, Laura L Hoon-Hanks, Gordon Mitchell, W David Walter, Matteo Manca, Ryan J Monello, Jenny G Powers, Margaret A Wild, Edward A Hoover and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tracking Prions by RT-QuIC: An Update.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas J HaleyDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA nicholas.j.haley@gmail.com.
Chris SiepkerDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Laura L Hoon-HanksDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Gordon MitchellCanadian Food Inspection Agency, National and OIE Reference Laboratory for Scrapie and CWD, Ottawa Laboratory Fallowfield, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
W David WalterU.S. Geological Survey, Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Matteo MancaTSE/Prion Biochemistry Section, Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Montana, USA.
Ryan J MonelloNational Park Service, Biological Resources Division, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jenny G PowersNational Park Service, Biological Resources Division, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Margaret A WildNational Park Service, Biological Resources Division, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Edward A HooverDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Byron CaugheyTSE/Prion Biochemistry Section, Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Montana, USA.
Jürgen A RichtDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Kansas State University · USNational Park Service · USColorado State University · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USCanadian Food Inspection Agency · CAUnited States Geological Survey · US

Funding

Zoonotic potential of CWD and influence of environmental contamination on prion propagationP01AI077774 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI CLAUDIO SOTO · 2008 to 2026
$36.1M
Detection of PrionsZIAAI001086 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CAUGHEY, BYRON · 2009 to 2025
$18.1M
Transmission and Pathogenesis of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)R01NS061902 · NINDS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHIASON, CANDACE K. · 2009 to 2022
$5.3M
CWD: A Model of Prion Transmission via Saliva and UrineK01OD010994 · OD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HALEY, NICHOLAS JAMES · 2012 to 2014
$310k
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI077774NIH HHS K01 OD010994NIH HHS K01OD010994NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wasting disease (CWD), a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy of cervids, was first documented nearly 50 years ago in Colorado and Wyoming and has since been detected across North America and the Republic of Korea. The expansion of this disease makes the development of sensitive diagnostic assays and antemortem sampling techniques crucial for the mitigation of its spread; this is especially true in cases of relocation/reintroduction or prevalence studies of large or protected herds, where depopulation may be contraindicated. This study evaluated the sensitivity of the real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay of recto-anal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (RAMALT) biopsy specimens and nasal brushings collected antemortem. These findings were compared to results of immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of ante- and postmortem samples. RAMALT samples were collected from populations of farmed and free-ranging Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni;n= 323), and nasal brush samples were collected from a subpopulation of these animals (n= 205). We hypothesized that the sensitivity of RT-QuIC would be comparable to that of IHC analysis of RAMALT and would correspond to that of IHC analysis of postmortem tissues. We found RAMALT sensitivity (77.3%) to be highly correlative between RT-QuIC and IHC analysis. Sensitivity was lower when testing nasal brushings (34%), though both RAMALT and nasal brush test sensitivities were dependent on both thePRNPgenotype and disease progression determined by the obex score. These data suggest that RT-QuIC, like IHC analysis, is a relatively sensitive assay for detection of CWD prions in RAMALT biopsy specimens and, with further investigation, has potential for large-scale and rapid automated testing of antemortem samples for CWD.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsyDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleIntestinal MucosaLymphoid TissueMaleNasal MucosaPathology, MolecularPrionsRuminantsSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsWasting Disease, ChronicPrions

Identifiers

PMID26888899
PMCPMC4809920
OpenAlexW2306667279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.