Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26888889›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of occupational hygiene2016

Comparison of Multiple Measures of Noise Exposure in Paper Mills.

Richard L Neitzel, Marianne Andersson, Eva Andersson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard L Neitzel1.Department of Environmental Health Sciences and University of Michigan Risk Science Center, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, 6611 SPH I, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; rneitzel@umich.edu.
Marianne Andersson2.Sahlgrenska Academy, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eva Andersson2.Sahlgrenska Academy, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoise exposures are associated with a host of adverse health effects, yet these exposures remain inadequately characterized in many industrial operations, including paper mills. We assessed noise at four paper mills using three measures: (i) personal noise dosimetry, (ii) area noise measurements, and (iii) questionnaire items addressing several different aspects of perceived noise exposure.

methodsWe assessed exposures to noise characterized using the three measures and compared the relationships between them. We also estimated the validity of each of the three measures using a novel application of the Method of Triads, which does not appear to have been used previously in the occupational health literature.

resultsWe collected 209 valid dosimetry measurements and collected perceived noise exposure survey items from 170 workers, along with 100 area measurements. We identified exposures in excess of 85 dBA at all mills. The dosimetry and area noise measurements assigned to individual subjects generally showed good agreement, but for some operations within mill, large differences between the two measures were observed, and a substantial fraction of paired measures differed by >5 dB. Perceived noise exposures varied greatly between the mills, particularly for an item related to difficulty speaking in noise. One perceived noise exposure item related to difficulty hearing due to noise showed strong and significant correlations with both dosimetry and area measurements. The Method of Triads analysis showed that dosimetry measures had the highest estimated validity coefficient (0.70), and that the best performing perceived exposure measure had validity that exceeded that of area measurements (0.48 versus 0.40, respectively).

conclusionsWorkers in Swedish pulp mills have the potential for exposures to high levels of noise. Our results suggest that, while dosimetry remains the preferred approach to exposure assessment, perceived noise exposures can be used to evaluate potential exposures to noise in epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Manufacturing IndustryNoise, OccupationalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOccupational ExposurePaperSwedenarea measurementsdosimetryjob exposure matrixmethod of triadsnoiseperceived exposure

Identifiers

PMID26888889
PMCPMC4879593
OpenAlexW2289071561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.