Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26888729›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Understanding vulnerability to self-harm in times of economic hardship and austerity: a qualitative study.

M C Barnes, D Gunnell, R Davies, K Hawton, N Kapur, J Potokar, J L Donovan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Local Inequalities in Health Behaviours: Longitudinal Findings from the Stockton-On-Tees Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M C BarnesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.
D GunnellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.
R DaviesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.
K HawtonCentre for Suicide Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
N KapurCentre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J PotokarSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.
J L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelf-harm and suicide increase in times of economic recession, but little is known about why people self-harm when in financial difficulty, and in what circumstances self-harm occurs. This study aimed to understand events and experiences leading to the episode of self-harm and to identify opportunities for prevention or mitigation of distress.

settingParticipants' homes or university rooms.

participants19 people who had attended hospital following self-harm in two UK cities and who specifically cited job loss, economic hardship or the impact of austerity measures as a causal or contributory factor. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Semistructured, in-depth interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed cross-sectionally and as case studies.

resultsStudy participants described experiences of severe economic hardship; being unable to find employment or losing jobs, debt, housing problems and benefit sanctions. In many cases problems accumulated and felt unresolvable. For others an event, such as a call from a debt collector or benefit change triggered the self-harm. Participants also reported other current or past difficulties, including abuse, neglect, bullying, domestic violence, mental health problems, relationship difficulties, bereavements and low self-esteem. These contributed to their sense of despair and worthlessness and increased their vulnerability to self-harm. Participants struggled to gain the practical help they felt they needed for their economic difficulties or therapeutic support that might have helped with their other co-existing or historically damaging experiences.

conclusionsEconomic hardships resulting from the recession and austerity measures accumulated or acted as a 'final straw' to trigger self-harm, often in the context of co-existing or historically damaging life-experiences. Interventions to mitigate these effects should include providing practical advice about economic issues before difficulties become insurmountable and providing appropriate psychosocial support for vulnerable individuals.

Indexed as

Economic RecessionAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseBereavementBullyingDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPovertyQualitative ResearchSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicideUnemploymentQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26888729
PMCPMC4762121
OpenAlexW2280326684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.