Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26888283›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

70S-scanning initiation is a novel and frequent initiation mode of ribosomal translation in bacteria.

Hiroshi Yamamoto, Daniela Wittek, Romi Gupta, Bo Qin, Takuya Ueda, Roland Krause, Kaori Yamamoto, Renate Albrecht, Markus Pech, Knud H Nierhaus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. At the Crossroad of Nucleotide Dynamics and Protein Synthesis in Bacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. RNA biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroshi YamamotoMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Daniela WittekMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
Romi GuptaMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
Bo QinMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Takuya UedaDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba Prefecture 277-8562, Japan.
Roland KrauseMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
Kaori YamamotoMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Renate AlbrechtMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
Markus PechMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; pech@genzentrum.lmu.de nierhaus@molgen.mpg.de.
Knud H NierhausMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Genetik, Abteilung Vingron, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; pech@genzentrum.lmu.de nierhaus@molgen.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the standard model of bacterial translation initiation, the small ribosomal 30S subunit binds to the initiation site of an mRNA with the help of three initiation factors (IF1-IF3). Here, we describe a novel type of initiation termed "70S-scanning initiation," where the 70S ribosome does not necessarily dissociate after translation of a cistron, but rather scans to the initiation site of the downstream cistron. We detailed the mechanism of 70S-scanning initiation by designing unique monocistronic and polycistronic mRNAs harboring translation reporters, and by reconstituting systems to characterize each distinct mode of initiation. Results show that 70S scanning is triggered by fMet-tRNA and does not require energy; the Shine-Dalgarno sequence is an essential recognition element of the initiation site. IF1 and IF3 requirements for the various initiation modes were assessed by the formation of productive initiation complexes leading to synthesis of active proteins. IF3 is essential and IF1 is highly stimulating for the 70S-scanning mode. The task of IF1 appears to be the prevention of untimely interference by ternary aminoacyl (aa)-tRNA•elongation factor thermo unstable (EF-Tu)•GTP complexes. Evidence indicates that at least 50% of bacterial initiation events use the 70S-scanning mode, underscoring the relative importance of this translation initiation mechanism.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisModels, MolecularPeptide Initiation FactorsRibosomesRNA, MessengerPeptide Initiation FactorsRNA, Messenger30S-binding initiation70S-scanning initiationprotein synthesisribosomal functionstranslational initiation

Identifiers

PMID26888283
PMCPMC4780633
OpenAlexW2284638198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.