ArticleBMC health services research2016
Classification and rates of adverse events in a Malawi male circumcision program: impact of quality improvement training.
Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review: Safety of surgical male circumcision in context of HIV prevention public health programmes.Gates open research · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- The cost-effectiveness of three methods of disseminating information to improve medical male circumcision in Uganda.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Article
- Implementing quality management strategies improves clinical quality as a voluntary medical male circumcision program in Namibia matures: a process analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Understanding the Evolving Role of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision as a Public Health Strategy in Eastern and Southern Africa: Opportunities and Challenges.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2022Review
- Urethrocutaneous fistula following VMMC: a case series from March 2013 to October 2019 in ZAZIC's voluntary medical male circumcision program in Zimbabwe.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Need for improved detection of voluntary medical male circumcision adverse events in Mozambique: a mixed-methods assessment.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Making Smarter Decisions Faster: Systems Engineering to Improve the Global Public Health Response to HIV.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2019Review
- Article
- Adverse events in a large-scale VMMC programme in Tanzania: findings from a case series analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Adolescent Wound-Care Self-Efficacy and Practices After Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision-A Multicountry Assessment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Article
- Timing of adverse events among voluntary medical male circumcision clients: Implications from routine service delivery in Zimbabwe.PloS one · 2018Article
- Continuous quality improvement intervention for adolescent and young adult HIV testing services in Kenya improves HIV knowledge.AIDS (London, England) · 2017Article
- Adverse event profile of a mature voluntary medical male circumcision programme performing PrePex and surgical procedures in Zimbabwe.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssessing safety outcomes is critical to inform optimal scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programs. Clinical trials demonstrated adverse event (AE) rates from 1.5 to 8 %, but we have limited data on AEs from VMMC programs.
methodsA group problem-solving, quality improvement (QI) project involving retrospective chart audits, case-conference AE classification, and provider training was conducted at a VMMC clinic in Malawi. For each identified potential AE, the timing, assessment, treatment, and resolution was recorded, then a clinical team classified each event for type and severity. During group discussions, VMMC providers were queried regarding lessons learned and challenges in providing care. After baseline evaluation, clinicians and managers initiated a QI plan to improve AE assessment and management. A repeat audit 6 months later used similar methods to assess the proportions and severity of AEs after the QI intervention.
resultsBaseline audits of 3000 charts identified 418 possible AEs (13.9 %), including 152 (5.1 %) excluded after determination of provider misclassification. Of the 266 remaining AEs, the team concluded that 257 were procedure-related (8.6 AEs per 100 VMMC procedures), including 6 (0.2 %) classified as mild, 218 (7.3 %) moderate, and 33 (1.1 %) severe. Structural factors found to contribute to AE rates and misclassification included: provider management of post-operative inflammation was consistent with national guidelines for urethral discharge; available antibiotics were from the STI formulary; providers felt well-trained in surgical skills but insecure in post-operative assessment and care. After implementation of the QI plan, a repeat process evaluating 2540 cases identified 115 procedure-related AEs (4.5 AEs per 100 VMMC procedures), including 67 (2.6 %) classified as mild, 28 (1.1 %) moderate, and 20 (0.8 %) severe. Reports of AEs decreased by 48 % (from 8.6 to 4.5 per 100 VMMC procedures, p < 0.001). Reports of moderate-plus-severe (program-reportable) AEs decreased by 75 % (from 8.4 to 1.9 per 100 VMMC procedures, p < 0.001).
conclusionsAE rates from our VMMC program implementation site were within the range of clinical trial experiences. A group problem-solving QI intervention improved post-operative assessment, clinical management, and AE reporting. Our QI process significantly improved clinical outcomes and led to more accurate reporting of overall and program-reportable AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.