Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26887565›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2016

Comparability of retinal thickness measurements using different scanning protocols on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Milton C Chew, Louis W Lim, Eujin Tan, Colin S Tan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milton C ChewTan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Louis W LimTan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Eujin TanTan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Colin S TanTan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore. Colintan_eye@yahoo.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal thickness measurements obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT) play an essential role both in multi-center clinical trials and in normal clinical practice. Different scanning protocols are available on most OCT devices, and it is important to ascertain whether the retinal thickness measurements obtained from these are comparable. This study aimed to compare retinal thickness measurements between raster and radial scanning protocols using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). In a prospective study, 32 healthy subjects were scanned sequentially using raster and radial protocols from a SD-OCT device. For both the raster and radial OCT scans, retinal thicknesses were measured manually subfoveally and at 12 other points at 0.5 mm intervals temporally and nasally on the horizontal OCT B-scan passing through the fovea. The retinal thickness measurements were compared using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Subfoveal retinal thickness was 227.0 µm when measured on the raster scan and 229.2 µm on the radial scan, with a mean difference of 2.2 µm (P = 0.141).The ICC for agreement was 0.889 (95 % confidence interval 0.818-0.933). Similar results were observed for retinal thickness measurements at all other points, with mean differences ranging from -3.37 to 2.59 µm, and ICC values ranging from 0.837 to 0.972. The retinal thickness measurements obtained by the raster and radial scans of the same SD-OCT device are comparable, with differences of less than 4 µm. This is of relevance when measurements made using different OCT scan protocols are compared.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetinaRetinal DiseasesTomography, Optical CoherenceYoung AdultOptical coherence tomographyRadial scan patternRaster scan patternRetinal thicknessSpectral-domain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.