Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26887052›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

XPG rs2296147 T>C polymorphism predicted clinical outcome in colorectal cancer.

Fang Wang, Shao-Dan Zhang, Hong-Mei Xu, Jin-Hong Zhu, Rui-Xi Hua, Wen-Qiong Xue, Xi-Zhao Li, Tong-Min Wang, Jing He, Wei-Hua Jia

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. High expression of ERCC5 predicts a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fang WangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Shao-Dan ZhangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Hong-Mei XuReproductive Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, China.
Jin-Hong ZhuMolecular Epidemiology Laboratory and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Rui-Xi HuaDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China.
Wen-Qiong XueSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Xi-Zhao LiSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Tong-Min WangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Jing HeSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Wei-Hua JiaSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Experimental Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNHarbin Medical University · CNState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), one of key components of nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER), is involved in excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the XPG gene have been reported to associate with the clinical outcome of various cancer patients. We aimed to assess the impact of four potentially functional SNPs (rs2094258 C>T, rs2296147 T>C, rs751402 G>A, and rs873601 G>A) in the XPG gene on prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A total of 1901 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed CRC were genotyped for four XPG polymorphisms. Cox proportional hazards model analysis controlled for several confounding factors was conducted to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the four included SNPs, only rs2296147 was shown to significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC. Patients carrying rs2296147 CT/TT genotype had a significantly shorter median 10 years PFS than those carrying CC genotype (88.5 months vs. 118.1 months), and an increased progression risk were observed with rs2296147 (HR = 1.324, 95% CI = 1.046-1.667). Moreover, none of the four SNPs were associated with overall survival. In conclusion, our study showed that XPG rs2296147 CT/TT variants conferred significant survival disadvantage in CRC patients in term of PFS. XPG rs2296147 polymorphism could be predictive of unfavorable prognosis of CRC patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNuclear ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesNuclear ProteinsTranscription Factorscolorectal canceroverall survivalprogression-free survivalsingle nucleotide polymorphismxeroderma pigmentosum group G

Identifiers

PMID26887052
PMCPMC4905506
OpenAlexW2281365274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.