Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26886766›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Why Do Floral Perfumes Become Different? Region-Specific Selection on Floral Scent in a Terrestrial Orchid.

Karin Gross, Mimi Sun, Florian P Schiestl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Floral Scents of DeceptiveEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Diverse floral scents in MalagasyFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pollination ecotypes and the origin of plant species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. DeceptiveFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Floral Scent Evolution in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Flower scent of Ceropegia stenantha: electrophysiological activity and synthesis of novel components.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Extreme diversification of floral volatiles within and among species ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Evolutionary ecology of nectar.Annals of botany · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karin GrossInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mimi SunInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian P SchiestlInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geographically structured phenotypic selection can lead to adaptive divergence. However, in flowering plants, such divergent selection has rarely been shown, and selection on floral signals is generally little understood. In this study, we measured phenotypic selection on display size, floral color, and floral scent in four lowland and four mountain populations of the nectar-rewarding terrestrial orchid Gymnadenia odoratissima in two years. We also quantified population differences in these traits and pollinator community composition. Our results show positive selection on display size and positive, negative, or absence of selection on different scent compounds and floral color. Selection on the main scent compounds was consistently stronger in the lowlands than in the mountains, and lowland plants emitted higher amounts of most of these compounds. Pollinator community composition also differed between regions, suggesting different pollinators select for differences in floral volatiles. Overall, our study is the first to document consistent regional differences in selection on floral scent, suggesting this pattern of selection is one of the evolutionary forces contributing to regional divergence in floral chemical signaling.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsFlowersOdorantsOrchidaceaePerfumePhenotypePollinationPrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait, HeritablePerfume

Identifiers

PMID26886766
PMCPMC4757410
OpenAlexW2279048271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.