Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26886555›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2016

Pharmacological methods for the preclinical assessment of therapeutics for OAB: an up-to-date review.

Emilio Sacco, Riccardo Bientinesi, Pierfrancesco Bassi, Diego Currò

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilio SaccoDepartment of Urology, "Agostino Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy. emilio.sacco@gmail.com.
Riccardo BientinesiDepartment of Urology, "Agostino Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.
Pierfrancesco BassiDepartment of Urology, "Agostino Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.
Diego CurròInstitute of Pharmacology, Catholic University Medical School, Largo Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLicenced oral pharmacotherapies for overactive bladder (OAB) act on muscarinic receptors or β

methodsA literature review of the most frequently used pharmacological methods for the preclinical assessment of new agents aimed at treating OAB, such as isolated organ technique, electrophysiological techniques, radioligand binding assay, and animal models, was carried out. Novel potential developments based on recent knowledge of urothelial and neural mechanisms are also discussed.

resultsThe isolated organ technique, electrophysiological techniques, and the radioligand binding assay are very effective methods for the demonstration that a novel pharmacological target with a specific and high affinity binding site for a new drug is present in the bladder and its modulation regulates functions critical for the pathophysiology of OAB. Afterward, the new drug should be shown to be effective in animal models of OAB, although the translational value of these models is limited by a poor pathophysiological relationship with human OAB. Exciting novel perspectives focusing in particular on the theory of the mucosal-bladder network have recently opened new paths in the discovery and assessment of new therapeutics in this field.

conclusionsAvailable experimental models still play a central role in the appraisal of OAB therapeutics; however, their shortcomings and the paucity of very effective drugs indicate the need for new models that better reproduce the pathophysiological features of OAB. Some emerging lines of research show promise. A change of perspective in the future evaluation of putative drugs is required, especially in the light of the latest knowledge on the key role of the mucosal-bladder network and the brain-bladder neural pathways.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnimalsElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleGuinea PigsHumansMiceModels, AnimalMuscarinic AntagonistsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRabbitsRadioligand AssayRatsReceptors, MuscarinicSwineUrinary BladderMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptors, MuscarinicAnimal modelsExtracellular recordingsIsolated organ techniqueOveractive bladder syndromePatch clampRadioligand binding assay

Identifiers

PMID26886555
OpenAlexW2280952275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.