ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2016
Pharmacological methods for the preclinical assessment of therapeutics for OAB: an up-to-date review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination drug therapy against OAB normalizes micturition parameters and increases the release of nitric oxide during chemically induced cystitis.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLicenced oral pharmacotherapies for overactive bladder (OAB) act on muscarinic receptors or β
methodsA literature review of the most frequently used pharmacological methods for the preclinical assessment of new agents aimed at treating OAB, such as isolated organ technique, electrophysiological techniques, radioligand binding assay, and animal models, was carried out. Novel potential developments based on recent knowledge of urothelial and neural mechanisms are also discussed.
resultsThe isolated organ technique, electrophysiological techniques, and the radioligand binding assay are very effective methods for the demonstration that a novel pharmacological target with a specific and high affinity binding site for a new drug is present in the bladder and its modulation regulates functions critical for the pathophysiology of OAB. Afterward, the new drug should be shown to be effective in animal models of OAB, although the translational value of these models is limited by a poor pathophysiological relationship with human OAB. Exciting novel perspectives focusing in particular on the theory of the mucosal-bladder network have recently opened new paths in the discovery and assessment of new therapeutics in this field.
conclusionsAvailable experimental models still play a central role in the appraisal of OAB therapeutics; however, their shortcomings and the paucity of very effective drugs indicate the need for new models that better reproduce the pathophysiological features of OAB. Some emerging lines of research show promise. A change of perspective in the future evaluation of putative drugs is required, especially in the light of the latest knowledge on the key role of the mucosal-bladder network and the brain-bladder neural pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.