Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26886411›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.

Rosaline Macharia, Paul Mireji, Edwin Murungi, Grace Murilla, Alan Christoffels, Serap Aksoy, Daniel Masiga

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosaline MachariaMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Paul MirejiDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Heath, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Edwin MurungiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya.
Grace MurillaBiotechnology Research Institute, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Alan ChristoffelsSouth African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Serap AksoyDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Heath, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Daniel MasigaMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Unit, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEYale University · USEgerton University · KEKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization · KEUniversity of the Western Cape · ZA

Funding

Control of Tsetse Fly Transmitted Diseases in KenyaU01AI115648 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AKSOY, SERAP · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Tsetse Transmitted African TrypanosomiasisD43TW007391 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AKSOY, SERAP · 2008 to 2017
$1.8M
Molecular and functional characterization of olfaction genes in tsetse fliesR03TW009444 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AKSOY, SERAP · 2013 to 2015
$157k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007391FIC NIH HHS R03 TW009444FIC NIH HHS R03TW009444NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI115648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, odour-baited traps have been used for control of tsetse flies (Diptera; Glossinidae), vectors of African trypanosomes. However, differential responses to known attractants have been reported in different Glossina species, hindering establishment of a universal vector control tool. Availability of full genome sequences of five Glossina species offers an opportunity to compare their chemosensory repertoire and enhance our understanding of their biology in relation to chemosensation. Here, we identified and annotated the major chemosensory gene families in Glossina. We identified a total of 118, 115, 124, and 123 chemosensory genes in Glossina austeni, G. brevipalpis, G. f. fuscipes, G. pallidipes, respectively, relative to 127 reported in G. m. morsitans. Our results show that tsetse fly genomes have fewer chemosensory genes when compared to other dipterans such as Musca domestica (n>393), Drosophila melanogaster (n = 246) and Anopheles gambiae (n>247). We also found that Glossina chemosensory genes are dispersed across distantly located scaffolds in their respective genomes, in contrast to other insects like D. melanogaster whose genes occur in clusters. Further, Glossina appears to be devoid of sugar receptors and to have expanded CO2 associated receptors, potentially reflecting Glossina's obligate hematophagy and the need to detect hosts that may be out of sight. We also identified, in all species, homologs of Ir84a; a Drosophila-specific ionotropic receptor that promotes male courtship suggesting that this is a conserved trait in tsetse flies. Notably, our selection analysis revealed that a total of four gene loci (Gr21a, GluRIIA, Gr28b, and Obp83a) were under positive selection, which confers fitness advantage to species. These findings provide a platform for studies to further define the language of communication of tsetse with their environment, and influence development of novel approaches for control.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisGenome, InsectAnimalsFemaleInsect ProteinsMaleMolecular Sequence DataTsetse FliesInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26886411
PMCPMC4757090
OpenAlexW2281631611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.