Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26886260›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Single Gene Prognostic Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Scooter Willis, Victor M Villalobos, Olivier Gevaert, Mark Abramovitz, Casey Williams, Branimir I Sikic, Brian Leyland-Jones

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Expression and clinical significance of cytochrome b561 in endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Biological Function of POLA2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scooter WillisDept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, United States of America.
Victor M VillalobosDivision of Medical Oncology, UC Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America.
Olivier GevaertStanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Mark AbramovitzDept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, United States of America.
Casey WilliamsDept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, United States of America.
Branimir I SikicStanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Brian Leyland-JonesDept. of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, United States of America.

Funding

(PQD2)New Biomarkers and Pathways to Enhance Cure in Ovarian CancersR01CA184968 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FANTL, WENDY JANE, SIKIC, BRANIMIR I · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Taxane Resistance in Breast and Ovarian Cancer CellsR01CA114037 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIKIC, BRANIMIR I · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114037NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 184968NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo discover novel prognostic biomarkers in ovarian serous carcinomas.

methodsA meta-analysis of all single genes probes in the TCGA and HAS ovarian cohorts was performed to identify possible biomarkers using Cox regression as a continuous variable for overall survival. Genes were ranked by p-value using Stouffer's method and selected for statistical significance with a false discovery rate (FDR) <.05 using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

resultsTwelve genes with high mRNA expression were prognostic of poor outcome with an FDR <.05 (AXL, APC, RAB11FIP5, C19orf2, CYBRD1, PINK1, LRRN3, AQP1, DES, XRCC4, BCHE, and ASAP3). Twenty genes with low mRNA expression were prognostic of poor outcome with an FDR <.05 (LRIG1, SLC33A1, NUCB2, POLD3, ESR2, GOLPH3, XBP1, PAXIP1, CYB561, POLA2, CDH1, GMNN, SLC37A4, FAM174B, AGR2, SDR39U1, MAGT1, GJB1, SDF2L1, and C9orf82).

conclusionA meta-analysis of all single genes identified thirty-two candidate biomarkers for their possible role in ovarian serous carcinoma. These genes can provide insight into the drivers or regulators of ovarian cancer and should be evaluated in future studies. Genes with high expression indicating poor outcome are possible therapeutic targets with known antagonists or inhibitors. Additionally, the genes could be combined into a prognostic multi-gene signature and tested in future ovarian cohorts.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseBiomarkers, TumorFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26886260
PMCPMC4757072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.