ArticlePloS one2016
Blinded by Beauty: Attractiveness Bias and Accurate Perceptions of Academic Performance.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Facial Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Pilot Study.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Article
- Impact of Dental Aesthetics on Dental Students' Academic and Social Performance: A PIDAQ-Based Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Face Value: Beauty, Punishment, and the Moral Politics of Appearance.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- It is not what you weigh, it is how you present it: body size, attractiveness, physical functioning, and access to partnership and sexuality for older men and women.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2025Article
- The Influence of Image Exposure Duration on Facial Perception-Why It Matters.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Risk Factors Associated With Bell's Palsy: A Real-World Analysis of 281,600 Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- When raters generalize: Examining sources of halo effects with mixture Rasch facets models.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The Effect of Social Media on the Decision to Have Aesthetics or Cosmetic Procedure: A Case-Control Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- The role of facial cues in signalling cooperativeness is limited and nuanced.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Medical aesthetic awareness among public in Malaysia and the factors that may influence it: A cross-sectional study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023Article
- Post COVID-19, still wear a face mask? Self-perceived facial attractiveness reduces mask-wearing intention.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Thematic Analysis of Students' Perceptions and Experiences of Bullying in UK Higher Education.Europe's journal of psychology · 2022Article
- Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Article
- E-perceptions and Business 'Mating': The Communication Effects of the Relative Width of Males' Faces in Business Portraits.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Facial shape affects self-perceived facial attractiveness.PloS one · 2021Observational
- Two multinational, observational surveys investigating perceptions of beauty and attitudes and experiences relating to aesthetic medical procedures.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2020Article
- Inferring Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk From Attractiveness in Online Dating Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Exploratory Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Expanding the Romantic Circle.Ethical theory and moral practice : an international forum · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the old adage not to 'judge a book by its cover', facial cues often guide first impressions and these first impressions guide our decisions. Literature suggests there are valid facial cues that assist us in assessing someone's health or intelligence, but such cues are overshadowed by an 'attractiveness halo' whereby desirable attributions are preferentially ascribed to attractive people. The impact of the attractiveness halo effect on perceptions of academic performance in the classroom is concerning as this has shown to influence students' future performance. We investigated the limiting effects of the attractiveness halo on perceptions of actual academic performance in faces of 100 university students. Given the ambiguity and various perspectives on the definition of intelligence and the growing consensus on the importance of conscientiousness over intelligence in predicting actual academic performance, we also investigated whether perceived conscientiousness was a more accurate predictor of academic performance than perceived intelligence. Perceived conscientiousness was found to be a better predictor of actual academic performance when compared to perceived intelligence and perceived academic performance, and accuracy was improved when controlling for the influence of attractiveness on judgments. These findings emphasize the misleading effect of attractiveness on the accuracy of first impressions of competence, which can have serious consequences in areas such as education and hiring. The findings also have implications for future research investigating impression accuracy based on facial stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.