ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2016
Trends in Serosorting and the Association With HIV/STI Risk Over Time Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV Self-Testing Increases HIV Testing Frequency in High-Risk Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Trial
- Impact of Awareness of Sexual Partners' HIV Serostatus on the HIV Acquisition among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Guangzhou, China: A Nested Case-Control Study.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Coinfection and repeat bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI) - retrospective study on male attendees of public STI clinics in an Asia Pacific city.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- A Behavioral Cascade of HIV Seroadaptation Among US Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Era of PrEP and U = U.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Regional disparity of HIV incidence and prevalence among men who have sex with men.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Potential of HIV Self-Sampling to Increase Testing Frequency Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men, and the Role of Online Result Communication: Online Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- High risk men who have sex with men in Spain are reporting low intentions of actively seeking HIV testing: results from a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Egocentric sexual networks of men who have sex with men in the United States: Results from the ARTnet study.Epidemics · 2020Article
- Network-Level Correlates of Sexual Risk Among Male Sex Workers in the United States: A Dyadic Analysis.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
- Population-Level Sexual Mixing According to HIV Status and Preexposure Prophylaxis Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Montreal, Canada: Implications for HIV Prevention.American journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: a global perspective.Sexual health · 2019Review
- Disclosure of HIV Serostatus and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use on Internet Hookup Sites Among Men Who have Sex with Men.AIDS and behavior · 2019Article
- Confronting Rising STIs in the Era of PrEP and Treatment as Prevention.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2019Review
- The Association Between Condomless Anal Sex and Social Support Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in Six U.S. Cities: A Study Using Data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network BROTHERS Study (HPTN 061).AIDS and behavior · 2019Article
- Old Pathogen, New Challenges: A Narrative Review of the Multilevel Drivers of Syphilis Increasing in American Men Who Have Sex With Men.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2018Review
- Management of acute HCV infection in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Review
- Condomless sex in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: prevalence, correlates, and implications for HIV transmission.Sexually transmitted infections · 2017Article
- HIV serostatus knowledge and serostatus disclosure with the most recent anal intercourse partner in a European MSM sample recruited in 13 cities: results from the Sialon-II study.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Article
- A Single Question to Examine the Prevalence and Protective Effect of Seroadaptive Strategies Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2017Article
- Operationalizing the Measurement of Seroadaptive Behaviors: A Comparison of Reported Sexual Behaviors and Purposely-Adopted Behaviors Among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) in Seattle.AIDS and behavior · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerosorting among men who have sex with men (MSM) is common, but recent data to describe trends in serosorting are limited. How serosorting affects population-level trends in HIV and other sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk is largely unknown.
methodsWe collected data as part of routine care from MSM attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic (2002-2013) and a community-based HIV/sexually transmitted disease testing center (2004-2013) in Seattle, WA. MSM were asked about condom use with HIV-positive, HIV-negative, and unknown-status partners in the prior 12 months. We classified behaviors into 4 mutually exclusive categories: no anal intercourse (AI); consistent condom use (always used condoms for AI); serosorting [condom-less anal intercourse (CAI) only with HIV-concordant partners]; and nonconcordant CAI (CAI with HIV-discordant/unknown-status partners; NCCAI).
resultsBehavioral data were complete for 49,912 clinic visits. Serosorting increased significantly among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative men over the study period. This increase in serosorting was concurrent with a decrease in NCCAI among HIV-negative MSM, but a decrease in consistent condom use among HIV-positive MSM. Adjusting for time since last negative HIV test, the risk of testing HIV positive during the study period decreased among MSM who reported NCCAI (7.1%-2.8%; P= 0.02), serosorting (2.4%-1.3%; P = 0.17), and no CAI (1.5%-0.7%; P = 0.01). Serosorting was associated with a 47% lower risk of testing HIV positive compared with NCCAI (adjusted prevalence ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.62).
conclusionsBetween 2002 and 2013, serosorting increased and NCCAI decreased among Seattle MSM. These changes paralleled a decline in HIV test positivity among MSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.