Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26885656›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Hemodynamic monitoring in the era of digital health.

Frederic Michard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Individualized Hemodynamic Management in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The future of intraoperative blood pressure management.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018
    Article
  17. Smartphones and e-tablets in perioperative medicine.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  20. The hospital of tomorrow in 10 points.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frederic MichardMiCo, Denens, Switzerland. frederic.michard@bluewin.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital innovations are changing medicine, and hemodynamic monitoring will not be an exception. Five to ten years from now, we can envision a world where clinicians will learn hemodynamics with simulators and serious games, will monitor patients with wearable or implantable sensors in the hospital and after discharge, will use medical devices able to communicate and integrate the historical, clinical, physiologic and biological information necessary to predict adverse events, propose the most rationale therapy and ensure it is delivered properly. Considerable intellectual and financial investments are currently made to ensure some of these new ideas and products soon become a reality.

Indexed as

ConnectivityDigital healthGraphical displaysHemodynamic monitoringHome monitoringImagingInternet of thingsMobile healthSensorWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID26885656
PMCPMC4757593
OpenAlexW2284004736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.