Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26885372›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2016

Mismatch in epitope specificities between IFNγ inflamed and uninflamed conditions leads to escape from T lymphocyte killing in melanoma.

Katherine Woods, Ashley J Knights, Matthew Anaka, Ralf B Schittenhelm, Anthony W Purcell, Andreas Behren, Jonathan Cebon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perspective: cancer vaccines in the era of immune checkpoint blockade.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine WoodsSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086 Australia ; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Level 5 ONJCWC, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC 3084 Australia.
Ashley J KnightsCancer Immunobiology Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne-Austin Branch, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew AnakaCancer Immunobiology Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne-Austin Branch, Melbourne, Australia.
Ralf B SchittenhelmDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia.
Anthony W PurcellDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia.
Andreas BehrenSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086 Australia ; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Level 5 ONJCWC, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC 3084 Australia.
Jonathan CebonSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086 Australia ; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Level 5 ONJCWC, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC 3084 Australia.
La Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA current focus in cancer treatment is to broaden responses to immunotherapy. One reason these therapies may prove inadequate is that T lymphocytes fail to recognize the tumor due to differences in immunogenic epitopes presented by the cancer cells under inflammatory or non-inflammatory conditions. The antigen processing machinery of the cell, the proteasome, cleaves proteins into peptide epitopes for presentation on MHC complexes. Immunoproteasomes in inflammatory melanomas, and in antigen presenting cells of the immune system, are enzymatically different to standard proteasomes expressed by tumors with no inflammation. This corresponds to alterations in protein cleavage between proteasome subtypes, and a disparate repertoire of MHC-presented epitopes.

methodsWe assessed steady state and IFNγ-induced immunoproteasome expression in melanoma cells. Using epitope specific T-lymphocyte clones, we studied processing and presentation of three NY-ESO-1 HLA-Cw3 restricted epitopes by melanoma cell lines. Our experimental model allowed comparison of the processing of three distinct epitopes from a single antigen presented on the same HLA complex. We further investigated processing of these epitopes by direct inhibition, or siRNA mediated knockdown, of the immunoproteasome catalytic subunit LMP7.

resultsOur data demonstrated a profound difference in the way in which immunogenic T-lymphocyte epitopes are presented by melanoma cells under IFNγ inflammatory versus non-inflammatory conditions. These alterations led to significant changes in the ability of T-lymphocytes to recognize and target melanoma cells.

conclusionsOur results illustrate a little-studied mechanism of immune escape by tumor cells which, with appropriate understanding and treatment, may be reversible. These data have implications for the design of cancer vaccines and adoptive T cell therapies.

Indexed as

Antigen processingImmunoproteasomeMelanomaT-cell killingTumor antigens

Identifiers

PMID26885372
PMCPMC4754849
OpenAlexW2279962296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.