Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26885204›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) rs2227981 C > T polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Weifeng Tang, Yafeng Wang, Heping Jiang, Pinghua Liu, Chao Liu, Haiyong Gu, Shuchen Chen, Mingqiang Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Investigation ofTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Investigation ofBioscience reports · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Relationship betweenCancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  13. Investigation ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2018
    Article
  14. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  15. Investigation ofOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The relationship betweenOncoTargets and therapy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weifeng TangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Yafeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, The People's Hospital of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture Jinghong, Yunnan Province, China.
Heping JiangDepartment of Emergency, Affiliated Jintan People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Jintan, China.
Pinghua LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture Jinghong, Yunnan Province, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China.
Haiyong GuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shuchen ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.
Mingqiang KangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Union Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have focused on the correlation between the programmed death-1 (PD-1) rs2227981 C > T polymorphism and the risk of cancer; however, the results of such studies remain conflicting. To address this gap, we performed this meta-analysis to identify the potential association. Search strategies were performed in PubMed and EMBASE using appropriate terms. In total, 2,977 cancer cases and 2,642 controls from seven publications were recruited in our study. According to the seven eligible publications, the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on the risk of cancer for the TT vs. CC and TT vs. CT+CC genotypes were 0.67 and 0.50-0.91 and 0.65 and 0.47-0.90, respectively. In a subgroup analysis by cancer type, PD-1 rs2227981 C > T polymorphism was associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.95; P = 0.009 for T vs. C and OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92; P = 0.005 for TT+CT vs. CC) and of other cancer (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = 0.004 for TT vs. CT+CC). In a subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significant decreased cancer risk was identified among Asians (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; P < 0.001 for T vs. C and OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; P = 0.001 for TT+CT vs. CC) and among Caucasians (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P = 0.047 for TT vs. CT+CC). These findings highlight the fact that the T allele of PD-1 rs2227981 C > T polymorphism modestly decreases the susceptibility of cancer. Nevertheless, further large and well-designed studies are needed to enrich the evidence of this association.

Indexed as

cancer riskPolymorphismprogrammed death-1

Identifiers

PMID26885204
PMCPMC4729990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.