Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884935›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Expression and significance of Nodal in human cancers: a meta-analysis.

Fen Ning, Hai-Fang Wang, Qiang Guo, Zong-Cai Liu, Zi-Qian Li, Jun Du

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Targeting the untargetable? Nodal expression in TNBC.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fen NingGuangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Department of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou 510623, Guangdong, China; Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China.
Hai-Fang WangDepartment of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China.
Qiang GuoDepartment of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.
Zong-Cai LiuDepartment of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China; Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou 510623, Guangdong, China.
Zi-Qian LiDepartment of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China.
Jun DuDepartment of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a global and growing problem. Nodal, which has been showed to be involved in occurrence and development of cancers, is an important embryonic morphogen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of Nodal expression in human cancers based on the published related articles. Online databases were searched to retrieve relevant articles published between 2000 and 2015. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confident intervals (CI) were employed to calculate the strength of significance. Finally, a total of 11 articles were screened out, including 801 cancer patients and 372 healthy controls. Nine kinds of cancers were contained, and Nodal was detected in 56.7% of all participants (665/1173). Overall, our result found that Nodal was highly expressed in cancer patients than that in healthy controls, indicating that Nodal expression was significantly associated with cancers progression (OR=21.72, 95% CI=9.94-47.46, P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that Nodal expression was significantly corrected with high WHO grade of human cancers (III+IV versus I+II: OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.63-3.71, P<0.00001). This significant relationship was also found in tumor size, differentiation degree, not observed in gender, age and lymphatic metastasis status of patients with all studied cancers in this meta-analysis. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that Nodal might be implicated in cancer progression, suggesting that it was a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for cancers.

Indexed as

Cancerexpressionmeta-analysisNodalsignificance

Identifiers

PMID26884935
PMCPMC4723780
OpenAlexW2409725635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.