Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884641›Full record

ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2015

Zeeshan H Syedain, Amir A Naqwi, Myrna Dolovich, Arif Somani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Aerosol Delivery for Preterm Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeeshan H SyedainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Amir A NaqwiMSP Corp, Shoreview, Minnesota, USA.
Myrna DolovichFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Arif SomaniFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
TSI (United States) · USMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
Airborne Nanoparticles for Therapeutic ApplicationsR44EY016229 · NEI · POWERSCOPE, INC · PI NAQWI, AMIR A · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
Intra-pulmonary aerosol delivery for intubated pediatric patientsR43HD072739 · NICHD · MSP CORPORATION · PI NAQWI, AMIR A · 2013 to 2013
$239k
Intraocular Aerosol Treatment for Inhibition of Proliferative VitreoretinopathyR43EY023504 · NEI · MSP CORPORATION · PI NAQWI, AMIR A · 2014 to 2014
$220k
Nanoparticle Generator for Animal Inhalation ExperimentsR43HL081789 · NHLBI · POWERSCOPE, INC · PI NAQWI, AMIR A · 2005 to 2005
$100k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NEI NIH HHS R43 EY023504NEI NIH HHS R44 EY016229NHLBI NIH HHS R43 HL081789NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD072739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For infants born with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), liquid bolus delivery of surfactant administered through an endotracheal tube is common practice. While this method is generally effective, complications such as transient hypoxia, hypercapnia, and altered cerebral blood flow may occur. Aerosolized surfactant therapy has been explored as an alternative. Unfortunately, past efforts have led to disappointing results as aerosols were generated outside the lungs with significant pharyngeal deposition and minimal intrapulmonary instillation. A novel aerosol generator (Microjet™) is evaluated herein for intrapulmonary aerosol generation within an endotracheal tube and tested with Curosurf and Infasurf surfactants. Compared with other aerosol delivery devices, this process utilizes low air flow (range 0.01-0.2 L/min) that is ideal for limiting potential barotrauma to the premature newborn lung. The mass mean diameter (MMD) of the particles for both tested surfactants was less than 4 μm, which is ideal for both uniform and distal lung delivery. As an indicator of phospholipid function, surfactant surface tension was measured before and after aerosol formation; with no significant difference. Moreover, this device has an outside diameter of <1mm, which permits insertion into an endotracheal tube (of even 2.0 mm). In the premature infant where intravenous access is either technically challenging or difficult, aerosol drug delivery may provide an alternative route in patient resuscitation, stabilization and care. Other potential applications of this type of device include the delivery of nutrients, antibiotics, and analgesics via the pulmonary route.

Identifiers

PMID26884641
PMCPMC4753072
OpenAlexW1554179823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.