ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016
Improved Method to Stratify Elderly Patients With Cancer at Risk for Competing Events.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019Trial
- Cancer incidence and mortality trends among older adults.npj aging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence to unlock real-world evidence in clinical oncology: A primer on recent advances.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Association of radioactive iodine treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer and cardiovascular death: a large population-based study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Article
- Prediction of tuberculosis-specific mortality for older adult patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The long-term outcome of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 1969 patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Competing risk nomogram for predicting cancer-specific mortality in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Treatment Considerations for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer with a Contraindication to Cisplatin.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations for Older Adults with Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Review
- Review
- Impact of age on treatment response in men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.BJUI compass · 2022Article
- Association between chemotherapy and prognostic factors of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: a SEER population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Development of a competing risk nomogram for the prediction of cause-specific mortality in patients with thymoma: a population-based analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Model to predict cause-specific mortality in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma: a competing risk analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Nomogram predicting survival to assist decision-making of radical prostatectomy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Competing risk analysis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular death in T1/2 kidney cancer: a SEER database analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Use of Cancer Registry Data for Comparative Effectiveness Research.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer using a comprehensive nomogram.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- A competing risk nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Development of a predictive nomogram for cause-specific mortality in surgically resected early-stage oesophageal cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare a novel generalized competing event (GCE) model versus the standard Cox proportional hazards regression model for stratifying elderly patients with cancer who are at risk for competing events.
methodsWe identified 84,319 patients with nonmetastatic prostate, head and neck, and breast cancers from the SEER-Medicare database. Using demographic, tumor, and clinical characteristics, we trained risk scores on the basis of GCE versus Cox models for cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. In test sets, we examined the predictive ability of the risk scores on the different causes of death, including second cancer mortality, noncancer mortality, and cause-specific mortality, using Fine-Gray regression and area under the curve. We compared how well models stratified subpopulations according to the ratio of the cumulative cause-specific hazard for cancer mortality to the cumulative hazard for overall mortality (ω) using the Akaike Information Criterion.
resultsIn each sample, increasing GCE risk scores were associated with increased cancer-specific mortality and decreased competing mortality, whereas risk scores from Cox models were associated with both increased cancer-specific mortality and competing mortality. GCE models created greater separation in the area under the curve for cancer-specific mortality versus noncancer mortality (P < .001), indicating better discriminatory ability between these events. Comparing the GCE model to Cox models of cause-specific mortality or all-cause mortality, the respective Akaike Information Criterion scores were superior (lower) in each sample: prostate cancer, 28.6 versus 35.5 versus 39.4; head and neck cancer, 21.1 versus 29.4 versus 40.2; and breast cancer, 24.6 versus 32.3 versus 50.8.
conclusionCompared with standard modeling approaches, GCE models improve stratification of elderly patients with cancer according to their risk of dying from cancer relative to overall mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.