Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884396›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2016

Differential regulation of mouse and human nephron progenitors by the Six family of transcriptional regulators.

Lori L O'Brien, Qiuyu Guo, YoungJin Lee, Tracy Tran, Jean-Denis Benazet, Peter H Whitney, Anton Valouev, Andrew P McMahon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic regulation of kidney development.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nanotherapeutics in Kidney Disease: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  12. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lori L O'BrienDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Qiuyu GuoDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA Division of Bioinformatics, Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
YoungJin LeeDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Tracy TranDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Jean-Denis BenazetDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Peter H WhitneyDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Anton ValouevDivision of Bioinformatics, Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA valouev@usc.edu amcmahon@med.usc.edu.
Andrew P McMahonDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Broad-CIRM Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA valouev@usc.edu amcmahon@med.usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Cell Interactions in Development of the Mammalian KidneyR37DK054364 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2008 to 2017
$7.0M
CELL INTERACTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAMMALIAN KIDNEYR01DK054364 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 1998 to 2022
$6.9M
GUDMAP2 - Production of Mouse Strains for Gene Anatomy of the Lower Urinary TractU01DK094526 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Four-dimensional Modeling of Mouse and Human Nephrogenesis.U01DK110792 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS [DK054364NIDDK NIH HHS DK094526NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054364NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK054364NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK094526NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK110792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nephron endowment is determined by the self-renewal and induction of a nephron progenitor pool established at the onset of kidney development. In the mouse, the related transcriptional regulators Six1 and Six2 play non-overlapping roles in nephron progenitors. Transient Six1 activity prefigures, and is essential for, active nephrogenesis. By contrast, Six2 maintains later progenitor self-renewal from the onset of nephrogenesis. We compared the regulatory actions of Six2 in mouse and human nephron progenitors by chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq). Surprisingly, SIX1 was identified as a SIX2 target unique to the human nephron progenitors. Furthermore, RNA-seq and immunostaining revealed overlapping SIX1 and SIX2 activity in 16 week human fetal nephron progenitors. Comparative bioinformatic analysis of human SIX1 and SIX2 ChIP-seq showed each factor targeted a similar set of cis-regulatory modules binding an identical target recognition motif. In contrast to the mouse where Six2 binds its own enhancers but does not interact with DNA around Six1, both human SIX1 and SIX2 bind homologous SIX2 enhancers and putative enhancers positioned around SIX1. Transgenic analysis of a putative human SIX1 enhancer in the mouse revealed a transient, mouse-like, pre-nephrogenic, Six1 regulatory pattern. Together, these data demonstrate a divergence in SIX-factor regulation between mouse and human nephron progenitors. In the human, an auto/cross-regulatory loop drives continued SIX1 and SIX2 expression during active nephrogenesis. By contrast, the mouse establishes only an auto-regulatory Six2 loop. These data suggest differential SIX-factor regulation might have contributed to species differences in nephron progenitor programs such as the duration of nephrogenesis and the final nephron count.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksHomeodomain ProteinsHumansKidneyMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalNephronsNerve Tissue ProteinsStem CellsTranscription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSIX1 protein, humanSix1 protein, mouseSIX2 protein, humanSix2 protein, mouseTranscription FactorsNephrogenesisNephronRegulatory networkSix1/2Transcription

Identifiers

PMID26884396
PMCPMC4760318
OpenAlexW2407045510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.