SynthesisMolecular neurobiology2016
CD105 Over-expression Is Associated with Higher WHO Grades for Gliomas.
Synthesis in Molecular neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Microvascular Density in Glioblastomas in Relation to p53 and Ki67 Immunoexpression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Extranodal lymphoma: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.Molecular biomedicine · 2023Review
- Glioblastoma CD105Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022Article
- Endoglin (CD105) and proliferation index in recurrent glioblastoma treated with anti-angiogenic therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Efficient targeted tumor imaging and secreted endostatin gene delivery by anti-CD105 immunoliposomes.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2018Article
- Prognostic value of endoglin-assessed microvessel density in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Assessment of Micro-vessel Density in Brain Gliomaby CD105 Expression.Iranian journal of pathology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD105 is an ancillary receptor of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), which has been suggested as a suitable biomarker for cancer-related angiogenesis and neovascularization (Nassiri et al. in Anticancer Res 31:2283-2290, 2011). However, the clinical significance of CD105 in WHO grade was rarely reported and the effects of CD105 signal transduction pathway on gliomas remain controversial and unclear. To get a convincing conclusion, performing a meta-analysis is essential. Relevant literature studies were included via careful evaluation, and standard mean difference (SMD) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) was calculated. We also made funnel plots to test the heterogeneity. In the present meta-analysis, a total of 11 eligible literatures involving 796 patients were incorporated. They were all conducted in China, revealing that CD105 overexpression in glioma tissues was strongly linked to high WHO grading (III+IV) (SMD -1.785, 95 % CI -2.133, -1.437; p = 0.000). No significant associations between CD105 and age (SMD -0.505, 95 % CI -1.054, 0.043; p = 0. 071), CD105 and gender (SMD 0.101, 95 % CI -0.103, 0.305; p = 0.333), and CD105 and tumor size (SMD -0.433, 95 % CI -1.326, 0.459; p = 0. 341) were detected. Besides, CD105 expression was closely associated with glioma patients' 3-year overall survival (OS; n = 2; HR = 4.357, 95 % CI 1.412, 7.303; p = 0.004). On the basis of Begg's and Egger's test or funnel plot, no publication bias was detected. In a nutshell, this meta-analysis demonstrated that CD105 overexpression correlates to higher WHO grade and poor survival and could be indicated as a helpful prognostic and diagnostic marker, or a useful therapy target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.