Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Deep phenotyping of 89 xeroderma pigmentosum patients reveals unexpected heterogeneity dependent on the precise molecular defect.

Hiva Fassihi, Mieran Sethi, Heather Fawcett, Jonathan Wing, Natalie Chandler, Shehla Mohammed, Emma Craythorne, Ana M S Morley, Rongxuan Lim, Sally Turner and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Central Nervous System Tumors in Xeroderma Pigmentosum: Five Cases and Review of the Literature.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Hiva FassihiNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; a.r.lehmann@sussex.ac.uk Hiva.Fassihi@gstt.nhs.uk.
Mieran SethiKing's College London, Kings Health Partners, Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom;
Heather FawcettGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom;
Jonathan WingGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom;
Natalie ChandlerGenetics Department, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom;
Shehla MohammedGenetics Department, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom;
Emma CraythorneNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Ana M S MorleyNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Rongxuan LimNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Sally TurnerNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Tanya HenshawNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Isabel GarroodNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Paola GiuntiNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Department of Molecular Neuroscience, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom;
Tammy HedderlyNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Adesoji AbionaNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Harsha NaikNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Gemma HarropNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
David McGibbonNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Nicolaas G J JaspersDepartment of Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
Elena BottaIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Tiziana NardoIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Miria StefaniniIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Antony R YoungKing's College London, Kings Health Partners, Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom;
Robert P E SarkanyNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Department of Photodermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom;
Alan R LehmannGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom; a.r.lehmann@sussex.ac.uk Hiva.Fassihi@gstt.nhs.uk.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBGuy's Hospital · GBIstituto di Genetica Molecolare · ITUniversity of Sussex · GBErasmus MC · NLKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M001210/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare DNA repair disorder characterized by increased susceptibility to UV radiation (UVR)-induced skin pigmentation, skin cancers, ocular surface disease, and, in some patients, sunburn and neurological degeneration. Genetically, it is assigned to eight complementation groups (XP-A to -G and variant). For the last 5 y, the UK national multidisciplinary XP service has provided follow-up for 89 XP patients, representing most of the XP patients in the United Kingdom. Causative mutations, DNA repair levels, and more than 60 clinical variables relating to dermatology, ophthalmology, and neurology have been measured, using scoring systems to categorize disease severity. This deep phenotyping has revealed unanticipated heterogeneity of clinical features, between and within complementation groups. Skin cancer is most common in XP-C, XP-E, and XP-V patients, previously considered to be the milder groups based on cellular analyses. These patients have normal sunburn reactions and are therefore diagnosed later and are less likely to adhere to UVR protection. XP-C patients are specifically hypersensitive to ocular damage, and XP-F and XP-G patients appear to be much less susceptible to skin cancer than other XP groups. Within XP groups, different mutations confer susceptibility or resistance to neurological damage. Our findings on this large cohort of XP patients under long-term follow-up reveal that XP is more heterogeneous than has previously been appreciated. Our data now enable provision of personalized prognostic information and management advice for each XP patient, as well as providing new insights into the functions of the XP proteins.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeUnited KingdomXeroderma PigmentosumYoung Adultneurodegenerationnucleotide excision repairocular diseaseskin cancerUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID26884178
PMCPMC4780618
OpenAlexW2275939505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.