Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26884175›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Arabidopsis type B cytokinin response regulators ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12 negatively regulate plant responses to drought.

Kien Huu Nguyen, Chien Van Ha, Rie Nishiyama, Yasuko Watanabe, Marco Antonio Leyva-González, Yasunari Fujita, Uven Thi Tran, Weiqiang Li, Maho Tanaka, Motoaki Seki and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
38.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abiotic Stress in Crop Production.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Poaceae Cytokinin Response RegulatorInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kien Huu NguyenSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Chien Van HaNational Key Laboratory of Plant Cell Biotechnology, Agricultural Genetics Institute, Vietnamese Academy of Agricultural Science, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam;
Rie NishiyamaSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Yasuko WatanabeSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Marco Antonio Leyva-GonzálezDepartment of Applied Biotechnology, StelaGenomics México, Irapuato, Guanajuato 36821, Mexico;
Yasunari FujitaBiological Resources and Post-Harvest Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8686, Japan;
Uven Thi TranSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Weiqiang LiSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Maho TanakaPlant Genomic Network Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
Motoaki SekiPlant Genomic Network Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology (JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan;
G Eric SchallerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755;
Luis Herrera-EstrellaLaboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad (Langebio)/Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Irapuato, Guanajuato 36500, Mexico lherrera@langebio.cinvestav.mx son.tran@riken.jp.
L S TranSignaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan; lherrera@langebio.cinvestav.mx son.tran@riken.jp.
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPAgricultural Genetics Institute · VNDartmouth College · USInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we used a loss-of-function approach to elucidate the functions of three Arabidopsis type B response regulators (ARRs)--namely ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12--in regulating the Arabidopsis plant responses to drought. The arr1,10,12 triple mutant showed a significant increase in drought tolerance versus WT plants, as indicated by its higher relative water content and survival rate on drying soil. This enhanced drought tolerance of arr1,10,12 plants can be attributed to enhanced cell membrane integrity, increased anthocyanin biosynthesis, abscisic acid (ABA) hypersensitivity, and reduced stomatal aperture, but not to altered stomatal density. Further drought-tolerance tests of lower-order double and single mutants indicated that ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12 negatively and redundantly control plant responses to drought, with ARR1 appearing to bear the most critical function among the three proteins. In agreement with these findings, a comparative genome-wide analysis of the leaves of arr1,10,12 and WT plants under both normal and dehydration conditions suggested a cytokinin (CK) signaling-mediated network controlling plant adaptation to drought via many dehydration/drought- and/or ABA-responsive genes that can provide osmotic adjustment and protection to cellular and membrane structures. Expression of all three ARR genes was repressed by dehydration and ABA treatments, inferring that plants down-regulate these genes as an adaptive mechanism to survive drought. Collectively, our results demonstrate that repression of CK response, and thus CK signaling, is one of the strategies plants use to cope with water deficit, providing novel insight for the design of drought-tolerant plants by genetic engineering.

Indexed as

DroughtsAbscisic AcidAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnthocyaninsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell MembraneCytokininsDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantMutationPlant LeavesPlant ShootsPlant StomataSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsAbscisic AcidAnthocyaninsArabidopsis ProteinsARR10 protein, ArabidopsisARR12 protein, ArabidopsisARR1 protein, ArabidopsisCytokininsDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factorscomparative transcriptome analysiscytokinin signalingdrought adaptiontype B response regulators

Identifiers

PMID26884175
PMCPMC4801291
OpenAlexW2287146849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.