ArticleScientific reports2016
Rapid multiplex detection of 10 foodborne pathogens with an up-converting phosphor technology-based 10-channel lateral flow assay.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming sensitivity limitations in lateral flow immunoassays for small-molecule detection: from tracer engineering to assay format innovation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Evolution of Next-Generation Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassays: From Engineered Nanomaterials to AI-Driven Detection.Biosensors · 2026Review
- The evolution of next-generation lateral flow assays for bacterial and fungal diagnostics.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of lateral flow assays in rapid livestock and poultry disease diagnostics.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Rapid Diagnosis of Viral Diseases.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Review
- Recognition Element-Based Strategies for Rapid Detection of Foodborne Pathogens: Recent Progress and Perspectives.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Metal and metal oxide nanoparticle-assisted molecular assays for the detection of Salmonella.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Application of a dual-modality colorimetric analysis method to inkjet printing lateral flow detection of Salmonella typhimurium.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Overlaid Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Simultaneous Detection of Two Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Plasmonic silver and gold nanoparticles: shape- and structure-modulated plasmonic functionality for point-of-caring sensing, bio-imaging and medical therapy.Chemical Society reviews · 2024Review
- Engineering Innovative Interfaces for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2023Review
- Conventional and advanced detection techniques of foodborne pathogens: A comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Colorimetric and photothermal dual-mode lateral flow immunoassay based on Au-FeMikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Glowstick-inspired smartphone-readable reporters for sensitive, multiplexed lateral flow immunoassays.Communications engineering · 2023Article
- Paper-based sensors for bacteria detection.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023Review
- Lateral Flow Microarray-Based ELISA for Cytokines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning-Based Analytical Systems: Food Forensics.ACS omega · 2022Review
- Naked-Eye Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens Using Multiplex Hyperbranched Rolling Circle Amplification and Magnetic Particles.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Toward Next Generation Lateral Flow Assays: Integration of Nanomaterials.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Advances, applications, and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for routinely encountered foodborne pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid high-throughput detection of foodborne pathogens is essential in controlling food safety. In this study, a 10-channel up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral flow (TC-UPT-LF) assay was established for the rapid and simultaneous detection of 10 epidemic foodborne pathogens. Ten different single-target UPT-LF strips were developed and integrated into one TC-UPT-LF disc with optimization. Without enrichment the TC-UPT-LF assay had a detection sensitivity of 10(4) CFU mL(-1) or 10(5) CFU mL(-1) for each pathogen, and after sample enrichment it was 10 CFU/0.6 mg. The assay also showed good linearity, allowing quantitative detection, with a linear fitting coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.916-0.998. The 10 detection channels did not cross-react, so multiple targets could be specifically detected. When 279 real food samples were tested, the assay was highly consistent (100%) with culture-based methods. The results for 110 food samples artificially contaminated with single or multiple targets showed a high detection rate (≥ 80%) for most target bacteria. Overall, the TC-UPT-LF assay allows the rapid, quantitative, and simultaneous detection of 10 kinds of foodborne pathogens within 20 min, and is especially suitable for the rapid detection and surveillance of foodborne pathogens in food and water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.