Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883659›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2016

The Ethical Imperative to Move to a Seven-Day Care Model.

Anthony Bell, Fiona McDonald, Tania Hobson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony BellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, MetroNorth Hospital and Health Service, Butterfield St, Herston, 4029, Australia.
Fiona McDonaldAustralian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. fiona.mcdonald@qut.edu.au.
Tania HobsonQEII Jubilee Hospital and Community Based Services, Metro South Health Level 5, QEII Jubilee Hospital, 360 Troughton Road Coopers Plains, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4108.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst the nature of human illness is not determined by time of day or day of week, we currently structure health service delivery around a five-day delivery model. At least one country is endeavouring to develop a systems-based approach to planning a transition from five- to seven-day healthcare delivery models, and some services are independently instituting program reorganization to achieve these ends as research, amongst other things, highlights increased mortality and morbidity for weekend and after-hours admissions to hospitals. In this article, we argue that this issue does not merely raise instrumental concerns but also opens up a normative ethical dimension, recognizing that clinical ethical dilemmas are impacted on and created by systems of care. Using health policy ethics, we critically examine whether our health services, as currently structured, are at odds with ethical obligations for patient care and broader collective goals associated with the provision of publicly funded health services. We conclude by arguing that a critical health policy ethics perspective applying relevant ethical values and principles needs to be included when considering whether and how to transition from five-day to seven-day models for health delivery.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAfter-Hours CareAmbulatory CareDelivery of Health CareHealth Services Needs and DemandHospital RestructuringHumansModels, OrganizationalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingQuality Assurance, Health CareState MedicineUnited KingdomDelivery of healthcareEthics, institutionalHealthcare ethicsHealthcare reform

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.