Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883594›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2016

Susceptibility to Ticks and Lyme Disease Spirochetes Is Not Affected in Mice Coinfected with Nematodes.

Denny Maaz, Sebastian Rausch, Dania Richter, Jürgen Krücken, Anja A Kühl, Janina Demeler, Julia Blümke, Franz-Rainer Matuschka, Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Susanne Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perpetuation of Borreliae.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denny MaazInstitute of Immunology, Centre of Infection Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian RauschInstitute of Immunology, Centre of Infection Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dania RichterEnvironmental Systems Analysis, Institute of Geoecology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Jürgen KrückenInstitute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anja A KühlDepartment of Medicine I for Gastroenterology, Infectious Disease, and Rheumatology, Research Center ImmunoSciences, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Janina DemelerInstitute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julia BlümkeInstitute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Franz-Rainer MatuschkaOutpatient Clinic, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Georg von Samson-HimmelstjernaInstitute of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne HartmannInstitute of Immunology, Centre of Infection Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany susanne.hartmann@fu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small rodents serve as reservoir hosts for tick-borne pathogens, such as the spirochetes causing Lyme disease. Whether natural coinfections with other macroparasites alter the success of tick feeding, antitick immunity, and the host's reservoir competence for tick-borne pathogens remains to be determined. In a parasitological survey of wild mice in Berlin, Germany, approximately 40% of Ixodes ricinus-infested animals simultaneously harbored a nematode of the genus Heligmosomoides We therefore aimed to analyze the immunological impact of the nematode/tick coinfection as well as its effect on the tick-borne pathogen Borrelia afzelii Hosts experimentally coinfected with Heligmosomoides polygyrus and larval/nymphal I. ricinus ticks developed substantially stronger systemic type 2 T helper cell (Th2) responses, on the basis of the levels of GATA-3 and interleukin-13 expression, than mice infected with a single pathogen. During repeated larval infestations, however, anti-tick Th2 reactivity and an observed partial immunity to tick feeding were unaffected by concurrent nematode infections. Importantly, the strong systemic Th2 immune response in coinfected mice did not affect susceptibility to tick-borne B. afzelii An observed trend for decreased local and systemic Th1 reactivity against B. afzelii in coinfected mice did not result in a higher spirochete burden, nor did it facilitate bacterial dissemination or induce signs of immunopathology. Hence, this study indicates that strong systemic Th2 responses in nematode/tick-coinfected house mice do not affect the success of tick feeding and the control of the causative agent of Lyme disease.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityAnimalsBorrelia burgdorferi GroupCoinfectionDisease Models, AnimalFemaleIxodesLyme DiseaseMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLNematode InfectionsNematospiroides dubiusTh1 CellsTh2 CellsTick Infestations

Identifiers

PMID26883594
PMCPMC4862734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.