Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883592›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2016

Experimental Models of Vaginal Candidiasis and Their Relevance to Human Candidiasis.

Antonio Cassone, Jack D Sobel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Innovative simvastatin-loaded emulgel effectively treats vulvovaginal candidiasis: in vivo efficacy and in vitro biopharmaceutical analysis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biofilm · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparing the therapeutic potentials ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Molecular association ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonio CassonePolo d'innovazione della genomica, genetica e biologia, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy a.cassone@pologgb.com.
Jack D SobelDetroit Medical Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a high-incidence disease seriously affecting the quality of life of women worldwide, particularly in its chronic, recurrent forms (RVVC), and with no definitive cure or preventive measure. Experimental studies in currently used rat and mouse models of vaginal candidiasis have generated a large mass of data on pathogenicity determinants and inflammation and immune responses of potential importance for the control of human pathology. However, reflection is necessary about the relevance of these rodent models to RVVC. Here we examine the chemical, biochemical, and biological factors that determine or contrast the forms of the disease in rodent models and in women and highlight the differences between them. We also appeal for approaches to improve or replace the current models in order to enhance their relevance to human infection.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCandidaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFemaleHumansMiceRats

Identifiers

PMID26883592
PMCPMC4862719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.