Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883476›Full record

ReviewJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2017

Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting.

Erin E Silvestri, Cynthia Yund, Sarah Taft, Charlena Yoder Bowling, Daniel Chappie, Kevin Garrahan, Eletha Brady-Roberts, Harry Stone, Tonya L Nichols

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Decontamination of Soil Contaminated at the Surface withEnvironmental engineering science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Fate and transport of viableJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) · 2024
    Article
  6. An Advanced Tape-Stripping Approach for High-Efficiency Sampling on Non-Absorbent Surfaces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. An Approach to Dynamic Sensing Data Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E SilvestriUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cynthia YundUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Sarah TaftUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Charlena Yoder BowlingUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Daniel ChappieBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kevin GarrahanBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Eletha Brady-RobertsUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Harry StoneBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Tonya L NicholsUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, Threat Consequence Assessment Division, Washington DC, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBattelle · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to estimate exposure. However, there are many challenges associated with estimating environmental concentrations of B. anthracis or other spore-forming organisms after such an event before being able to estimate exposure. These challenges include: (1) collecting environmental field samples that are adequate for the intended purpose, (2) conducting laboratory analyses and selecting the reporting format needed for the laboratory data, and (3) analyzing and interpreting the data using appropriate statistical techniques. This paper summarizes some key challenges faced in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting microbial field data from a contaminated site. Although the paper was written with considerations for B. anthracis contamination, it may also be applicable to other bacterial agents. It explores the implications and limitations of using field data for determining environmental concentrations both before and after decontamination. Several findings were of interest. First, to date, the only validated surface/sampling device combinations are swabs and sponge-sticks on stainless steel surfaces, thus limiting availability of quantitative analytical results which could be used for statistical analysis. Second, agreement needs to be reached with the analytical laboratory on the definition of the countable range and on reporting of data below the limit of quantitation. Finally, the distribution of the microbial field data and statistical methods needed for a particular data set could vary depending on these data that were collected, and guidance is needed on appropriate statistical software for handling microbial data. Further, research is needed to develop better methods to estimate human exposure from pathogens using environmental data collected from a field setting.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalMicrobiological TechniquesSpecimen HandlingBacillus anthracisBioterrorismEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHumansQuality ControlSpores, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26883476
PMCPMC5318663
OpenAlexW2442427347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.