Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Expression Profiles of In Vitro Produced Vitrified Bovine Blastocysts.

Zongliang Jiang, Patrick Harrington, Ming Zhang, Sadie L Marjani, Joonghoon Park, Lynn Kuo, Csaba Pribenszky, Xiuchun Cindy Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cryopreservation of Gametes and Embryos and Their Molecular Changes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptome Analysis of Rainbow Trout (International journal of genomics · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zongliang JiangCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticcut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Patrick HarringtonDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Ming ZhangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Animal Reproduction Institute, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China, 510005.
Sadie L MarjaniCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticcut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Joonghoon ParkCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticcut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Lynn KuoDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
Csaba PribenszkyLaboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Herd Health, University of Veterinary Science, Istvan u. 2. 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Xiuchun Cindy TianCenter for Regenerative Biology, Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticcut, Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, USA.
University of Connecticut · USGuangxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) has been used to pre-condition embryos before essential, yet potentially detrimental procedures such as cryopreservation. However, the mechanisms for HHP are poorly understood. We treated bovine blastocysts with three different HHP (40, 60 and 80 MPa) in combination with three recovery periods (0, 1 h, 2 h post HHP). Re-expansion rates were significantly higher at 40 and 60 but lower at 80 MPa after vitrification-warming in the treated groups than controls. Microarray analysis revealed 399 differentially expressed transcripts, representing 254 unique genes, among different groups. Gene ontology analysis indicated that HHP at 40 and 60 MPa promoted embryo competence through down-regulation of genes in cell death and apoptosis, and up-regulation of genes in RNA processing, cellular growth and proliferation. In contrast, 80 MPa up-regulated genes in apoptosis, and down-regulated protein folding and cell cycle-related genes. Moreover, gene expression was also influenced by the length of the recovery time after HHP. The significantly over-represented categories were apoptosis and cell death in the 1 h group, and protein folding, response to unfolded protein and cell cycle in the 2 h group compared to 0 h. Taken together, HHP promotes competence of vitrified bovine blastocysts through modest transcriptional changes.

Indexed as

Hydrostatic PressureVitrificationAnimalsApoptosisBlastocystCattleCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyCryopreservationFertilization in VitroGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene OntologyReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID26883277
PMCPMC4756375
OpenAlexW2418199290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.