Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883248›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2016

Identifying Mechanisms Behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a Computational Study Based on First Principles.

Bernhard J Grieser, Leonhard Kleiser, Dominik Obrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vestibular Hypersensitivity in Patients with Chronic Noise Exposure.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  6. Differential Activation of Canal and Otolith Afferents by Acoustic Tone Bursts in Rats.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biomechanics of Third Window Syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernhard J GrieserInstitute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstr. 3, CH-8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Leonhard KleiserInstitute of Fluid Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstr. 3, CH-8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik ObristARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Murtenstr. 50, CH-3008, Bern, Switzerland. dominik.obrist@artorg.unibe.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD) suffer from events of dizziness and vertigo in response to sound, also known as Tullio phenomenon (TP). The present work seeks to explain the fluid-dynamical mechanisms behind TP. In accordance with the so-called third window theory, we developed a computational model for the vestibular signal pathway between stapes and SCD. It is based on first principles and accounts for fluid-structure interactions arising between endolymph, perilymph, and membranous labyrinth. The simulation results reveal a wave propagation phenomenon in the membranous canal, leading to two flow phenomena within the endolymph which are in close interaction. First, the periodic deformation of the membranous labyrinth causes oscillating endolymph flow which forces the cupula to oscillate in phase with the sound stimulus. Second, these primary oscillations of the endolymph induce a steady flow component by a phenomenon known as steady streaming. We find that this steady flow of the endolymph is typically in ampullofugal direction. This flow leads to a quasi-steady deflection of the cupula which increases until the driving forces of the steady streaming are balanced by the elastic reaction forces of the cupula, such that the cupula attains a constant deflection amplitude which lasts as long as the sound stimulus. Both response types have been observed in the literature. In a sensitivity study, we obtain an analytical fit which very well matches our simulation results in a relevant parameter range. Finally, we correlate the corresponding eye response (vestibulo-ocular reflex) with the fluid dynamics by a simplified model of lumped system constants. The results reveal a "sweet spot" for TP within the audible sound spectrum. We find that the underlying mechanisms which lead to TP originate primarily from Reynolds stresses in the fluid, which are weaker at lower sound frequencies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEndolymphHumansLabyrinth DiseasesSemicircular CanalsSyndromeVertigofluid dynamicsfluid–structure interactionslow-phase eye velocitysteady streamingsuperior canal dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID26883248
PMCPMC4791416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.