Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26883118›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2016

Evaluating a complex model designed to increase access to high quality primary mental health care for under-served groups: a multi-method study.

Christopher Dowrick, Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Karina Lovell, Suzanne Edwards, Jonathan Lamb, Katie Bristow, Mark Gabbay, Heather Burroughs, Susan Beatty and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christopher DowrickInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. cfd@liv.ac.uk.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Carolyn Chew-GrahamPrimary Care and Health Sciences Research Institute, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Karina LovellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean MacFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Suzanne EdwardsCollege of Medicine, Grove Building, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Jonathan LambNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Katie BristowInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Mark GabbayInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Heather BurroughsPrimary Care and Health Sciences Research Institute, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Susan BeattySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean MacFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Waquas WaheedNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mark HannNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Linda GaskNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with mental distress are disadvantaged because care is not available or does not address their needs. In order to increase access to high quality primary mental health care for under-served groups, we created a model of care with three discrete elements: community engagement, primary care training and tailored wellbeing interventions. We have previously demonstrated the individual impact of each element of the model. Here we assess the effectiveness of the combined model in increasing access to and improving the quality of primary mental health care. We test the assumptions that access to the wellbeing interventions is increased by the presence of community engagement and primary care training; and that quality of primary mental health care is increased by the presence of community engagement and the wellbeing interventions.

methodsWe implemented the model in four under-served localities in North-West England, focusing on older people and minority ethnic populations. Using a quasi-experimental design with no-intervention comparators, we gathered a combination of quantitative and qualitative information. Quantitative information, including referral and recruitment rates for the wellbeing interventions, and practice referrals to mental health services, was analysed descriptively. Qualitative information derived from interview and focus group responses to topic guides from more than 110 participants. Framework analysis was used to generate findings from the qualitative data.

resultsAccess to the wellbeing interventions was associated with the presence of the community engagement and the primary care training elements. Referrals to the wellbeing interventions were associated with community engagement, while recruitment was associated with primary care training. Qualitative data suggested that the mechanisms underlying these associations were increased awareness and sense of agency. The quality of primary mental health care was enhanced by information gained from our community mapping activities, and by the offer of access to the wellbeing interventions. There were variable benefits from health practitioner participation in community consultative groups. We also found that participation in the wellbeing interventions led to increased community engagement.

conclusionsWe explored the interactions between elements of a multilevel intervention and identified important associations and underlying mechanisms. Further research is needed to test the generalisability of the model.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials, reference ISRCTN68572159 . Registered 25 February 2013.

Indexed as

AgedEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesModels, TheoreticalPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareResearch DesignVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID26883118
PMCPMC4756439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.