ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2016
Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of KIDSCREEN-27 and KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaires.
Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor game rehabilitation for children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities-medical care dependent group: feasibility case series study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescence: exploring the validity of the Spanish version of the KIDSCREEN-10.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Associations Between 24-Hour Movement Behaviors and Health-Related Quality of Life in East Asian Children.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enabling six- to ten-year-old children to self-report their wellbeing and quality of life: development and psychometric investigation of an age-adapted and video-assisted version of the KIDSCREEN-27.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the WHO-5 and WHO-4 well-being index scales for assessing psychological well-being and detecting depression in Japanese school-aged children: a community-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Measuring health-related quality of life in a Chinese Mainland adolescent population: psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese self-reported KIDSCREEN-27 and KIDSCREEN-10 index.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Development of A Japanese Version of the Family Poly-Victimization Screen (FPS-J).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Cross-sectional associations between early mobile device usage and problematic behaviors among school-aged children in the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children's Health.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2023Article
- The KIDSCREEN-27 Quality of Life Measure for Romanian Children Aged 6: Reliability and Validity of the Romanian Version.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Article
- Psychometric analysis of the Brazilian-version Kidscreen-27 questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Observational
- Validation of the Chinese Version of KIDSCREEN-10 Quality of Life Questionnaire: A Rasch Model Estimation.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The 2-Year Course of Internet Addiction Among a Japanese Adolescent Psychiatric Clinic Sample with Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2019Article
- Assessing health-related quality of life in Japanese children with a chronic condition: validation of the DISABKIDS chronic generic module.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the KIDSCREEN-27 (J-KIDSCREEN-27) and KIDSCREEN-10 (J-KIDSCREEN-10) questionnaires, which are shorter versions of the KIDSCREEN-52 (J-KIDSCREEN-52).
methodsThe present analyses are based on a pre-existing dataset of the J-KIDSCREEN-52 validation study, including 1564 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years and their 1326 parents. All were asked to complete the J-KIDSCREEN and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) in a one-way random effects model, and internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Agreement between child and parent scores was evaluated using ICCs in a two-way mixed effects model. To assess concurrent validity, a sub-sample of 535 parents evaluated their child's mental health status using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
resultsFor children, test-retest ICCs were ≥0.60 and Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70 for every dimension of both instruments. Correlations of corresponding dimensions between the J-KIDSCREEN-27 or -10 and the PedsQL were acceptable. For parents, test-retest ICCs were ≥0.60, Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70, and ICCs between child and parent scores ≥0.41 in every dimension of both instruments. In multivariate logistic regression models, after adjusting for confounders, lower health-related QOL in every dimension of both instruments, except Physical Well-being, was significantly associated with higher odds ratios for borderline and clinical ranges of the SDQ.
conclusionThe child/adolescent and parent/proxy versions of the J-KIDSCREEN-27 and J-KIDSCREEN-10 demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.