ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2016
Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.
Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Minimally invasive drainage versus open surgical debridement in SAP/SMAP - a network meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties.Updates in surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial).The British journal of surgery · 2019Trial
- Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2017Trial
- Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical risk in pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable periampullary tumors.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Prophylactic abdominal drainage versus no-drainage after left pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gland surgery · 2024Article
- Life-threatening event in laparoscopic hepatic surgery: Training curriculum on sudden hepatic artery haemorrhage.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
- A modified pancreaticojejunostomy anastomotic technique using double U-sutures for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- The efficacy and safety of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgeryGland surgery · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions has slowly been gaining acceptance over the past decade and is being introduced in many centres. Some studies suggest that this approach is equivalent to or better than open surgery, but randomized data are needed to assess outcomes. In this Review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery by aggregating high-quality published evidence. Various aspects, including the benefits, limitations, oncological efficacy, learning curve and latest innovations, are discussed. The focus is on laparoscopic Whipple procedure and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for both benign and malignant disease, but robot-assisted surgery is also addressed. Surgical and oncological outcomes are discussed as well as quality of life parameters and the cost efficiency of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. We have also included decision-aid algorithms based on the literature and our own expertise; these algorithms can assist in the decision to perform a laparoscopic or open procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26882881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.